1. Introduction
Rabies virus (RABV) represents an enveloped negative-sense, single-stranded ribonucleic acid-based virus that infects mammals, although the degree of transmission varies from species to species. The virus has a length that generally varies from 100 to 300 nm and a diameter of approximately 75 nm in the majority of the cases. It first needs to express RNA-dependent RNA Polymerase before its genome becomes activated for distribution, meaning that, the less sensitive the viral genome is—due to various external factors—the less capable it is to express its activation enzyme. RABV-induced encephalitis was first documented around 2,000 years B.C. and represents one of the most complicated and life threatening illnesses mankind has ever come across. Despite the fact that humans primarily become infected as a result of a direct transmission of the virus from infected dogs, the primary reservoirs of the virus are not in domestic animals, such as dogs and ferrets, but in wild animals, such as bats, foxes and raccoons. The virus is mainly transmitted directly from the saliva of infected animals through bites and deep scratches, transmission of infected saliva through the intact mucosal layer of the host is uncommon and airborne transmission has been deemed as virtually impossible, particularly if the environment is natural and in the open air. As soon as the virus is suspended through micro-drops of infected saliva into the dry air, it quickly becomes neutralized and its structure and genetic sequence are then disintegrated. Once the virus infects a host organism, it then travels toward the encephalon at a median speed of 5-10 cm per day, although it highly varies from case to case. It seems that the speed of the viral migration in the nervous system is proportional with the quality and extent of the innate immune sensitivity, meaning that, generally speaking, the virus migrates faster with age, and likely this also applies with the health background status of the patient. Moreover, the speed of the viral load migration could be proportional with the amount of time it was exposed to environmental factors during the process of transmission. The virus typically survives in fluids and at temperatures ranging from 27 to 37 degrees Celsius. Due to the fact that the virus is enveloped and its ssRNA is negative-sense, it is particularly sensitive to the outside environment. UV radiation was found to lyse the virus within seconds if found on dry material, whilst dry air alone at a temperature outside of the 27-37 degree Celsius range was found to weaken and lyse the virus robustly as well. RABV was found to survive longest on glass and metal surfaces, and this may be due to the longest sustainability of water molecules on surfaces as such. Although airborne transmission is almost taken out of the question of transmission and no cases as such have ever been documented in the open environment, everybody who encountered a potentially rabid animal receives the public health recommendation to receive post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP), which includes a 5-dose course of rabies vaccination and a one or two-dose course of prepared anti-RABV IgM and IgG immunoglobulins. The recommendation is not based upon the rarity of transmission, but upon the virtual certainty of death in case symptoms of the disease develop. Despite the fact that a safe and effective clinical approach exists, there is still a wide extent of evidence to be determined with regards to the duration of prophylactic immunity against the disease. One clinical case of rabies occurred in a patient who had been immunized around 13 years beforehand, raising a few worries with regards to the length of immunity against the disease. Furthermore, there is evidence to suggest that the clinical disease can become unpreventable even with a full course of prophylaxis that is administered several weeks and months before the first symptoms occur, as studies indicate that, once the viral load reaches elements of the central nervous system or even principal pathways of the peripheral nervous system, no currently available clinical approaches can stop its advance to the encephalon, where it is known to result in the onset of viral encephalitis.
The irreversible progression of the disease to coma and systemic organ failure was found to be due to the uncontrolled inflammation of the encephalon, as the virus quickly spread in the organ. Clinicians would then be strongly encouraged to deduce that the virus would be the primary factor of causing brain death. Nevertheless, it may be important to take into consideration the tremendous ability of the virus to evade important pathways of immune activation and major antimicrobial activity. It is particularly the first-line immune system that is likely targeted by the virus during its irreversible advance from the spinal cord to the encephalon, as the virus was found to heavily hijack the interferon system. However, unlike other major clinical illnesses, where administered recombinant human interferon-alpha, -beta and -lambda play a role as immunizing components, rabies was only found to have its incubation period prolonged following the administration of such a clinical approach. Although this would mean that interferons as such play only a significant role as vaccine adjuvants, this marks the partial tackling of the viral load migration toward the brain. As a result, it may be that seeking further innate immune system stimulating factors in the current research efforts could gradually get the clinical world closer to the point where the migration of the viral load is completely stopped and where the host immune system would be given the necessary tools to detect and lyse the viral copies. In other words, it may be the advanced phenomenon of viral self-camouflaging that is the primary cause of pathogenesis and virtual certainty of disease-induced death. Furthermore, it may be the manner of immune activation in the final stages of viral spread that is inappropriate for the actual context of the disease, as the immune system could be “misled” to fight against a virus that operates completely based on the model of immune activation. In other words, the only solution against the problem is a temporal lack of immune response, as all survivors of the disease were found to become almost fully functional again. RABV could not be targeting the core elements of the central nervous system, but the core elements of immunity that contribute to its discernment. As a result, whilst the ‘Milwaukee’ protocol could be a significant step toward the discovery of the keys of a complete immune conquest against the virus, the temporary inactivation of the central nervous system could actually not be fully matching to the context of immunopathogenesis. A temporary inactivation of the host immune system would probably be at least more matching to the context, and it would require to be as short-term as possible, and to take place in a septical environment.
2. Discussion
Microbial evasion of the host immune systems could represent a factor of lethal pathogenesis that is of a primary importance. All microbial agents are known to spread in the host organisms through a mechanism of innate immune evasion, and the diversity of such immune evasion is wide. Some pathogens mainly aim to inhibit the interferon system via hijacking the activity of pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs), such as Toll-Like Receptors (TLRs) 3, 7 and 8, and RIG-I-Like Receptors (RLRs), such as Melanoma-Differentiation Associated protein 5 (MDA5), others target the transcription factors for the expression of Interferon-encoding genes (INGs), others cleave the mRNA molecules that encode Type I and Type III IFNs, others prevent the transport of exocytosed IFNs to Interferon-binding receptors, such as IFNAR1/2 and IFNLR1/IL10R2, whilst others prevent the activation and/or translation of various Interferon-Stimulated Genes (ISGs). Type III Interferons were often particularly found to pronouncedly stimulate the production of antiviral immune responses and reduce the extent of pathogenic inflammatory activation. Some pathogens target exocytosed Interferon-Stimulated Gene products in a direct response against their ability to lyse specific viral proteins, such as non-structural proteins 1 and 2, that evolved in their initial response against first-line immunity, thereby highlighting the core evolutionary battle section, despite the central importance of adaptive immune components, such as primary dendritic cells, monocytes, M1 and M2 macrophages, B- and T-lymphocytes, alongside IgA, IgM and IgG antibodies. Microbial evasion is known to be visibly associated with the development of disrupted ratios of M1 to M2 macrophage activation, often implicating the first as aberrantly activated and the latter as weak. It could be that, the more advanced level of induced first-line immune escape, the more disrupted the M1/M2 macrophage ratio often is. Specifically, it was recently discovered that RABV induces M1 macrophage polarization and, instead of the initial expectations that there would be the M0 state of neutralization reached, an experimental study showed that several states of M1, M2a and M2c polarization were detected post RABV-infection, with overall a unique macrophage polarization extent, potentially marking the advanced level of virus-induced immune escape. Importantly, multiple viral infective pathways were detected to have significant implications upon the interferon system, which implies that RABV has direct ways of inhibiting major antiviral immune responses. Rather than inhibiting the activation of M1 and M2 macrophages, RABV prevalently agonizes it, resulting in an effect upon the activity of antiviral genes, such as IFIT, OAS, TRIM and APOBEC3A. Hence, this study could indicate the allowance of RABV for delayed immune responses to operate freely, as its load would already be advancing through a new group of cells and silencing their antiviral genes by the time cells that had been infected a longer time beforehand would have their antiviral genes activated after the induced delay (Embregts C. et al., 2023).
It is perhaps interesting to note the poetic traits of human immunity, the foundational role played by its peripheral side, which marks innate immunity (Carp T., 2023). In the determination of a precise resolution of the big image of human immunity, it may also be important to mention the existence of a strong relationship of co-dependence and of interdependence between major innate and adaptive immune components. In the case of RABV, due to the negative-sense nature of the viral ribonucleic acid, the number of expressed viral proteins is restricted. Nevertheless, the viral genome was found to translate glycoproteins for the purpose of inhibiting Type I Interferon-based immune responses, and the therapeutic approach of RNA interference has been taken into consideration to aid host cells in their process of IFN I signaling (Denizot M. et al., 2012). Furthermore, it has been suggested that small drug-like molecular agonists could be developed to stimulate the activity of RLRs, as well as of the Interferon Regulatory Factor 3 (IRF3), which in turn would lead to the production, exocytosis and transmission of Type I IFNs to cells containing various ISGs that are responsible with the production of major antiviral cytokines. IRF3 is known to play a major role in the adequate synthesis of Type I IFNs and produce a broad extent of viral load clearance. Overall, such an approach could result in a tissular activation of innate immune mechanisms responsible for the induction of a sharp decrease of the local viral load, and this could very likely apply to the rabies viral disease (Pattahbi S. et al., 2015). Furthermore, lambda-interferon has been shown to manage RABV infection and restrict encephalic inflammation following the onset of rabies, by promoting the activation of the JAK-STAT pathway, by enhancing the activation and expression of ISGs and by stimulating the expression of the blood-brain barrier (BBB)-bound ZO-1 protein, which is implicated in the maintenance of the integrity of tight junctions and overall, in the restriction of encephalic inflammation. RABV specimens containing IFN-lambda2 and IFN-lambda3-encoding genes were found to reduce the production rate of pro-inflammatory cytokines in infected astrocytes and microglial cells (Li Y. et al., 2020). IFN-lambda was also found to stimulate the recovery of patients from central nervous system-related autoimmune responses (Manivagasam S. et al., 2022). Due to the high extent of viral self-camouflaging, it seems that the only approach that would substantially decrease the mortality rate of the disease would be to develop a counter immune “self-camouflaging” method, which would also be known as “fighting off the disease without fighting at all”. This status would, of course, be temporary and, in an accordance as high as possible with the safety of a silent host immunity. The most complicated situation would be in patients with underlying health conditions and/or with family history of immunological, oncological and genetic disease. This scenario would only highlight the stage of immunological evolution mankind is at, where self-defense becomes a necessary method to survive advanced microbial evolution. But there is a slight possibility for a high quality offensive against advanced pathogens during this process of immune ”self-camouflage”. Due to the fact that nasal immunization with UV-neutralized RABV copies was made possible for the animal species of foxes, there could be a novel research method of combining a low dose of glycosylated alpha-, beta- and lambda-interferons with the neutralized viral copies and/or with anti-RABV and/or PRV IgA immunoglobulins, depending on the viral agent, due to the proximity of the nasal cavity to the encephalon, as well as to the existence of pores that make connections between the nasal cavity and the encephalic neuronal network more facile.
Given the current level of evidence available on all public health databases, there could be a probability of a significantly effective early therapeutic approach against rabies. The timeline of the approach could include the following; the administration of strong innate immune stimulators and modulators, the administration of low to medium doses of Zinc ionophores, such as quinine or chloroquine, to temporarily inactivate the immune system, the allowance of the viral load to further spread without a significant immune reaction, the administration of human recombinant IFN I, II and III with a glycosylation site on the N- or O-terminus, alongside IFN-treated natural and adaptive lymphocytes, which could be deemed as “super-lymphocytes” due to their increased intelligence against the highly developed methods of first-line immune evasion by RABV, as well as the intravenous administration of high doses of immunostimulatory/modulatory minerals, such as Vitamins B3, 6, 9 and 12, Vitamin C, Vitamin D3 and Zinc, alongside others. Zinc ionophores represent drug-like compounds that enhance the process of ion channel-mediated endocytosis of Zinc, which is known for its major role in immunomodulation and the induction of microbial lysis. Interestingly, chloroquine is an antimalarial drug that is also known as a major immunosuppressant, meaning that, whilst some therapeutic drugs stimulate the production of immune responses whilst increasing the process of clearing the microbial load, other drugs inhibit existing immune responses whilst enhancing microbial clearance, and this highlights the complexity of immunity as a whole. A relatively decreased dosage of corticosteroids could be combined with the chloroquine immunosuppressant drugs to enhance a transient reduction of the immune reactions during important stages of viral encephalitis. Also, a number of antiviral drugs have been tested for both Rabies and Pseudorabies viruses (RABV and PRV), and some studies suggest that certain broad-spectrum antiviral drugs, such as Umifenovir, Favipiravir, Ribavirin and low-dose Ivermectin play a considerable role in the prevention of the disease by means of inducing viral clearance in major areas of the peripheral and central nervous system. One study suggested that Favipiravir could play a role in viral clearance as major as anti-RABV immunoglobulins. Furthermore, surgery could become a viable option if the virus causes uncontrollable harm in the encephalon, whether directly or indirectly, as a direct method of treatment with UVB and UVC radiation on the surface of the encephalon would become necessary to destroy the viral load and stimulate host immunity to restrict and cease its damaging reaction against vital components of the central nervous system, which is known to coordinate all bodily functions, thereby to have substantial implications on the general integrity and functioning of the human body. It could be possible to project that an immunomodulatory process as such would decrease the mortality rate of the disease, from 99%, all the way to 10% or less, provided that the methods of neuronal surgery are precise up to date in relation to the current state of medical progress. The method of targeting the virus using its own physical frequency, based on the models developed by Dr. Rife, could be researched further, as the high mortality rate of the disease may be raising a bioethical urgency to develop safe methods of precise biophysical targeting of the microbe.
3. Conclusion
Whilst rabies is certainly situated among the most complicated and long-sustained infectious diseases that mankind has witnessed, the current state of scientific and medical progress, as well as the recent shift of attention toward the hidden “gem” of first-line immune pathways, it has now become possible that clinicians develop pharmaceutical approaches to considerably decrease the mortality rate of the disease whilst maintaining risks of drug-induced adverse events toward zero, via a specific inclusion of prophylactic and early therapeutic innate immune stimulation, to simultaneously stimulate and modulate the produced adaptive immune responses. The development of anti-rabies vaccines by Dr. Louis Pasteur certainly represents a milestone in the highly complex and often energy-draining process of microbiological research, as the discipline of vaccinology was discovered and implemented in human civilization during the midst of the modern era. As with all other mainstream processes that human life comprises, the discipline of vaccinology requires a continuous development to become up to date with the fresh demands of evolved microbial illnesses that locally threaten the integrity and wellbeing of human inhabitants. The administration of recombinant innate immune components, as well as adaptive lymphocytes with advanced innate immunity themselves could be combined with the administration of small drug-like agonist compounds that stimulate the activity of PRRs implicated in the detection of RABV copies, as well as the activation of the cGAS-STING pathway to ultimately stimulate a more systemic production of antiviral and anti-inflammatory cytokines. The advanced level of immune evasion displayed by the virus may imply that the areas of the immune system localized around the encephalon remain incapable of detecting the virus in cells where it induced the transient inhibition of their interferon system and the fact that the aberrant immune responses also remain behind the actual state of tissue infection during 99% of the cases may imply that the immune system at that stage does not have any control over the virus, despite the high intensity of its developed activity. As a result, the latter treatment method involving a restart of the immune system may be among the most feasible methods, potentially exceeding the ‘Milwaukee’ protocol substantially. Overall, it is likely that the research community needs to thoroughly apprehend the extent of complexity that human and mammal immunity displays, directly and subtly, before developing a “brainstorm” approach to control and possibly eradicate rabies in the end.
References
- Davis, B. M., Rall, G. F., & Schnell, M. J. (2015). Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Rabies Virus (But Were Afraid to Ask). Annual review of virology, 2(1), 451–471. [CrossRef]
- Fooks, A. R., Cliquet, F., Finke, S., Freuling, C., Hemachudha, T., Mani, R. S., Müller, T., Nadin-Davis, S., Picard-Meyer, E., Wilde, H., & Banyard, A. C. (2017). Rabies. Nature reviews. Disease primers, 3, 17091. [CrossRef]
- Ribadeau-Dumas, F., Dacheux, L., & Bourhy, H. (2013). La rage [Rabies]. Medecine sciences: M/S, 29(1), 47–55. [CrossRef]
- Johnson, N., Vos, A., Freuling, C., Tordo, N., Fooks, A. R., & Müller, T. (2010). Human rabies due to lyssavirus infection of bat origin. Veterinary microbiology, 142(3-4), 151–159. [CrossRef]
- Banyard, A. C., Hayman, D., Johnson, N., McElhinney, L., & Fooks, A. R. (2011). Bats and lyssaviruses. Advances in virus research, 79, 239–289. [CrossRef]
- van der Poel, W. H., Lina, P. H., & Kramps, J. A. (2006). Public health awareness of emerging zoonotic viruses of bats: a European perspective. Vector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.), 6(4), 315–324. [CrossRef]
- Schatz, J., Fooks, A. R., McElhinney, L., Horton, D., Echevarria, J., Vázquez-Moron, S., Kooi, E. A., Rasmussen, T. B., Müller, T., & Freuling, C. M. (2013). Bat rabies surveillance in Europe. Zoonoses and public health, 60(1), 22–34. [CrossRef]
- East, M. L., Hofer, H., Cox, J. H., Wulle, U., Wiik, H., & Pitra, C. (2001). Regular exposure to rabies virus and lack of symptomatic disease in Serengeti spotted hyenas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98(26), 15026–15031. [CrossRef]
- Gold, S., Donnelly, C. A., Nouvellet, P., & Woodroffe, R. (2020). Rabies virus-neutralising antibodies in healthy, unvaccinated individuals: What do they mean for rabies epidemiology?. PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 14(2), e0007933. [CrossRef]
- Mancy, R., Rajeev, M., Lugelo, A., Brunker, K., Cleaveland, S., Ferguson, E. A., Hotopp, K., Kazwala, R., Magoto, M., Rysava, K., Haydon, D. T., & Hampson, K. (2022). Rabies shows how scale of transmission can enable acute infections to persist at low prevalence. Science (New York, N.Y.), 376(6592), 512–516. [CrossRef]
- Hampson, K., Dushoff, J., Cleaveland, S., Haydon, D. T., Kaare, M., Packer, C., & Dobson, A. (2009). Transmission dynamics and prospects for the elimination of canine rabies. PLoS biology, 7(3), e53. [CrossRef]
- Velasco-Villa, A., Escobar, L. E., Sanchez, A., Shi, M., Streicker, D. G., Gallardo-Romero, N. F., Vargas-Pino, F., Gutierrez-Cedillo, V., Damon, I., & Emerson, G. (2017). Successful strategies implemented towards the elimination of canine rabies in the Western Hemisphere. Antiviral research, 143, 1–12. [CrossRef]
- Fekadu M. (1993). Canine rabies. The Onderstepoort journal of veterinary research, 60(4), 421–427.
- Zhu, J. Y., Pan, J., & Lu, Y. Q. (2015). A case report on indirect transmission of human rabies. Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B, 16(11), 969–970. [CrossRef]
- Páez, A., Rey, G., Agudelo, C., Dulce, A., Parra, E., Díaz-Granados, H., Heredia, D., & Polo, L. (2009). Brote de rabia urbana transmitida por perros en el distrito de Santa Marta, Colombia, 2006-2008 [Outbreak of urban rabies transmitted by dogs in Santa Marta, northern Colombia]. Biomedica: revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud, 29(3), 424–436.
- Scott, T. P., & Nel, L. H. (2016). Subversion of the Immune Response by Rabies Virus. Viruses, 8(8), 231. [CrossRef]
- Feige, L., Zaeck, L. M., Sehl-Ewert, J., Finke, S., & Bourhy, H. (2021). Innate Immune Signaling and Role of Glial Cells in Herpes Simplex Virus- and Rabies Virus-Induced Encephalitis. Viruses, 13(12), 2364. [CrossRef]
- Denizot, M., Neal, J. W., & Gasque, P. (2012). Encephalitis due to emerging viruses: CNS innate immunity and potential therapeutic targets. The Journal of infection, 65(1), 1–16. [CrossRef]
- Lafon M. (2008). Immune evasion, a critical strategy for rabies virus. Developments in biologicals, 131, 413–419.
- Zhang, G., Wang, H., Mahmood, F., & Fu, Z. F. (2013). Rabies virus glycoprotein is an important determinant for the induction of innate immune responses and the pathogenic mechanisms. Veterinary microbiology, 162(2-4), 601–613. [CrossRef]
- Tuffereau, C., Schmidt, K., Langevin, C., Lafay, F., Dechant, G., & Koltzenburg, M. (2007). The rabies virus glycoprotein receptor p75NTR is not essential for rabies virus infection. Journal of virology, 81(24), 13622-13630.
- Yang, F., Lin, S., Ye, F., Yang, J., Qi, J., Chen, Z., Lin, X., Wang, J., Yue, D., Cheng, Y., Chen, Z., Chen, H., You, Y., Zhang, Z., Yang, Y., Yang, M., Sun, H., Li, Y., Cao, Y., Yang, S., … Lu, G. (2020). Structural Analysis of Rabies Virus Glycoprotein Reveals pH-Dependent Conformational Changes and Interactions with a Neutralizing Antibody. Cell host & microbe, 27(3), 441–453.e7. [CrossRef]
- Warner, C., Fekadu, M., Whitfield, S., & Shaddock, J. (1999). Use of anti-glycoprotein monoclonal antibodies to characterize rabies virus in formalin-fixed tissues. Journal of virological methods, 77(1), 69–74. [CrossRef]
- Gu, T. J., Wei, W., Duan, Y., Jiang, C. L., Chen, Y., Yu, X. H., Wu, J. X., Wu, Y. G., & Kong, W. (2011). Identification of binding epitope for anti-rabies virus glycoprotein single-chain Fv fragment FV57. Protein and peptide letters, 18(11), 1099–1106. [CrossRef]
- Ross B, A., Favi C, M., & Vásquez V, A. (2008). Glicoproteína del virus rábico: Estructura, inmunogenicidad y rol en la patogenia [Rabies virus glycoprotein: structure, immunogenicity and pathogenic role]. Revista chilena de infectologia: organo oficial de la Sociedad Chilena de Infectologia, 25(2), S14–S18.
- Pattabhi, S., Wilkins, C. R., Dong, R., Knoll, M. L., Posakony, J., Kaiser, S., Mire, C. E., Wang, M. L., Ireton, R. C., Geisbert, T. W., Bedard, K. M., Iadonato, S. P., Loo, Y. M., & Gale, M., Jr (2015). Targeting Innate Immunity for Antiviral Therapy through Small Molecule Agonists of the RLR Pathway. Journal of virology, 90(5), 2372–2387. [CrossRef]
- Chopy, D., Detje, C. N., Lafage, M., Kalinke, U., & Lafon, M. (2011). The type I interferon response bridles rabies virus infection and reduces pathogenicity. Journal of neurovirology, 17(4), 353–367. [CrossRef]
- Faul, E. J., Wanjalla, C. N., Suthar, M. S., Gale, M., Wirblich, C., & Schnell, M. J. (2010). Rabies virus infection induces type I interferon production in an IPS-1 dependent manner while dendritic cell activation relies on IFNAR signaling. PLoS pathogens, 6(7), e1001016. [CrossRef]
- Yamaoka, S., Ito, N., Ohka, S., Kaneda, S., Nakamura, H., Agari, T., Masatani, T., Nakagawa, K., Okada, K., Okadera, K., Mitake, H., Fujii, T., & Sugiyama, M. (2013). Involvement of the rabies virus phosphoprotein gene in neuroinvasiveness. Journal of virology, 87(22), 12327–12338. [CrossRef]
- Kovesdi, I., & Bakacs, T. (2020). Therapeutic Exploitation of Viral Interference. Infectious disorders drug targets, 20(4), 423–432. [CrossRef]
- Yamada, K., Noguchi, K., Komeno, T., Furuta, Y., & Nishizono, A. (2016). Efficacy of Favipiravir (T-705) in Rabies Postexposure Prophylaxis. The Journal of infectious diseases, 213(8), 1253–1261. [CrossRef]
- Rostami, A., & Ciric, B. (2013). Role of Th17 cells in the pathogenesis of CNS inflammatory demyelination. Journal of the neurological sciences, 333(1-2), 76–87. [CrossRef]
- Du Pont, V., Plemper, R. K., & Schnell, M. J. (2019). Status of antiviral therapeutics against rabies virus and related emerging lyssaviruses. Current opinion in virology, 35, 1–13. [CrossRef]
- Chai, Q., He, W. Q., Zhou, M., Lu, H., & Fu, Z. F. (2014). Enhancement of blood-brain barrier permeability and reduction of tight junction protein expression are modulated by chemokines/cytokines induced by rabies virus infection. Journal of virology, 88(9), 4698–4710. [CrossRef]
- Fang, A., Yuan, Y., Huang, F., Wang, C., Tian, D., Zhou, R., Zhou, M., Chen, H., Fu, Z. F., & Zhao, L. (2022). Lab-Attenuated Rabies Virus Facilitates Opening of the Blood-Brain Barrier by Inducing Matrix Metallopeptidase 8. Journal of virology, 96(17), e0105022. [CrossRef]
- Kuang, Y., Lackay, S. N., Zhao, L., & Fu, Z. F. (2009). Role of chemokines in the enhancement of BBB permeability and inflammatory infiltration after rabies virus infection. Virus research, 144(1-2), 18–26. [CrossRef]
- Li, Y., Zhao, L., Luo, Z., Zhang, Y., Lv, L., Zhao, J., Sui, B., Huang, F., Cui, M., Fu, Z. F., & Zhou, M. (2020). Interferon-λ Attenuates Rabies Virus Infection by Inducing Interferon-Stimulated Genes and Alleviating Neurological Inflammation. Viruses, 12(4), 405. [CrossRef]
- Manivasagam, S., Williams, J. L., Vollmer, L. L., Bollman, B., Bartleson, J. M., Ai, S., Wu, G. F., & Klein, R. S. (2022). Targeting IFN-λ Signaling Promotes Recovery from Central Nervous System Autoimmunity. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md.: 1950), 208(6), 1341–1351. [CrossRef]
- Yunna, C., Mengru, H., Lei, W., & Weidong, C. (2020). Macrophage M1/M2 polarization. European journal of pharmacology, 877, 173090. [CrossRef]
- Ye, Y., Xu, Y., Lai, Y., He, W., Li, Y., Wang, R., Luo, X., Chen, R., & Chen, T. (2018). Long non-coding RNA cox-2 prevents immune evasion and metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma by altering M1/M2 macrophage polarization. Journal of cellular biochemistry, 119(3), 2951–2963. [CrossRef]
- Xie, C., Guo, B., Liu, C., Lin, Y., Wu, B., Wang, Q., Li, Z., & Tu, Z. (2016). Xi bao yu fen zi mian yi xue za zhi = Chinese journal of cellular and molecular immunology, 32(7), 865–869.
- Xie, C., Liu, C., Wu, B., Lin, Y., Ma, T., Xiong, H., Wang, Q., Li, Z., Ma, C., & Tu, Z. (2016). Effects of IRF1 and IFN-β interaction on the M1 polarization of macrophages and its antitumor function. International journal of molecular medicine, 38(1), 148–160. [CrossRef]
- Embregts, C. W. E., Wentzel, A. S., den Dekker, A. T., van IJcken, W. F. J., Stadhouders, R., & GeurtsvanKessel, C. H. (2023). Rabies virus uniquely reprograms the transcriptome of human monocyte-derived macrophages. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 13, 1013842. [CrossRef]
- Lafon M. (2005). Modulation of the immune response in the nervous system by rabies virus. Current topics in microbiology and immunology, 289, 239–258. [CrossRef]
- Embregts, C. W. E., Begeman, L., Voesenek, C. J., Martina, B. E. E., Koopmans, M. P. G., Kuiken, T., & GeurtsvanKessel, C. H. (2021). Street RABV Induces the Cholinergic Anti-inflammatory Pathway in Human Monocyte-Derived Macrophages by Binding to nAChr α7. Frontiers in immunology, 12, 622516. [CrossRef]
- Liu, S. Q., Xie, Y., Gao, X., Wang, Q., & Zhu, W. Y. (2020). Inflammatory response and MAPK and NF-κB pathway activation induced by natural street rabies virus infection in the brain tissues of dogs and humans. Virology journal, 17(1), 157. [CrossRef]
- Kali, S., Jallet, C., Azebi, S., Cokelaer, T., Da Fonseca, J. P., Wu, Y., Barbier, J., Cintrat, J. C., Gillet, D., & Tordo, N. (2021). Broad spectrum compounds targeting early stages of rabies virus (RABV) infection. Antiviral research, 188, 105016. [CrossRef]
- Blaising, J., Polyak, S. J., & Pécheur, E. I. (2014). Arbidol as a broad-spectrum antiviral: an update. Antiviral research, 107, 84–94. [CrossRef]
- Turner G. S. (1972). Rabies vaccines and interferon. The Journal of hygiene, 70(3), 445–453. [CrossRef]
- Boriskin, Y. S., Leneva, I. A., Pécheur, E. I., & Polyak, S. J. (2008). Arbidol: a broad-spectrum antiviral compound that blocks viral fusion. Current medicinal chemistry, 15(10), 997–1005. [CrossRef]
- Teissier, E., Zandomeneghi, G., Loquet, A., Lavillette, D., Lavergne, J. P., Montserret, R., Cosset, F. L., Böckmann, A., Meier, B. H., Penin, F., & Pécheur, E. I. (2011). Mechanism of inhibition of enveloped virus membrane fusion by the antiviral drug arbidol. PloS one, 6(1), e15874. [CrossRef]
- Shiraki, K., & Daikoku, T. (2020). Favipiravir, an anti-influenza drug against life-threatening RNA virus infections. Pharmacology & therapeutics, 209, 107512. [CrossRef]
- Jochmans, D., & Neyts, J. (2019). The path towards effective antivirals against rabies. Vaccine, 37(33), 4660–4662. [CrossRef]
- Smreczak, M., Orłowska, A., Marzec, A., Trębas, P., Kycko, A., Reichert, M., Koraka, P., Osterhaus, A. D. M. E., & Żmudziński, J. F. (2019). The effect of combined drugs therapy on the course of clinical rabies infection in a murine model. Vaccine, 37(33), 4701–4709. [CrossRef]
- Smreczak, M., Marzec, A., Orłowska, A., Trębas, P., Reichert, M., Kycko, A., Koraka, P., Osterhaus, A., & Żmudziński, J. F. (2019). The effect of selected molecules influencing the detrimental host immune response on a course of rabies virus infection in a murine model. Vaccine, 37(33), 4715–4723. [CrossRef]
- Marosi, A., Dufkova, L., Forró, B., Felde, O., Erdélyi, K., Širmarová, J., Palus, M., Hönig, V., Salát, J., Tikos, R., Gyuranecz, M., Růžek, D., Martina, B., Koraka, P., Osterhaus, A. D. M. E., & Bakonyi, T. (2019). Combination therapy of rabies-infected mice with inhibitors of pro-inflammatory host response, antiviral compounds and human rabies immunoglobulin. Vaccine, 37(33), 4724–4735. [CrossRef]
- Niu, X., Wang, H., & Fu, Z. F. (2011). Role of chemokines in rabies pathogenesis and protection. Advances in virus research, 79, 73–89. [CrossRef]
|
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).