Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) and Supervised Ma-Chine Learning Based Algorithms for Prediction of Surface Roughness of Additive Manufactured Polyactic Acid (PLA) Specimens

Version 1 : Received: 21 April 2023 / Approved: 23 April 2023 / Online: 23 April 2023 (04:04:49 CEST)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Mishra, A.; Jatti, V.S.; Sefene, E.M.; Paliwal, S. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) and Supervised Machine Learning-based Algorithms for Prediction of Surface Roughness of Additively Manufactured Polylactic Acid (PLA) Specimens. Appl. Mech. 2023, 4, 668-698. Mishra, A.; Jatti, V.S.; Sefene, E.M.; Paliwal, S. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) and Supervised Machine Learning-based Algorithms for Prediction of Surface Roughness of Additively Manufactured Polylactic Acid (PLA) Specimens. Appl. Mech. 2023, 4, 668-698.

Abstract

Structural integrity is a crucial aspect of engineering components, particularly in the field of additive manufacturing (AM). Surface roughness is a vital parameter that significantly influences the structural integrity of additively manufactured parts. In this study, we present a comprehensive investigation into the relationship between surface roughness and structural integrity of Polyactic Acid (PLA) specimens produced through additive manufacturing. This research work focuses on the prediction of surface roughness of Additive Manufactured Polyactic Acid (PLA) specimens using eight different supervised machine learning regression-based algorithms. For the first time, Explainable AI techniques are employed to enhance the interpretability of the machine learning models. The eight algorithms used in this study are Support Vector Regression, Random Forest, XG Boost, Ada Boost, Catboost, Decision Tree, Extra Tree regressor, and Gradient Boosting regressor. The study analyzes the performance of these algorithms to predict the surface roughness of PLA specimens, while also investigating the impact of individual input parameters through Explainable AI methods. The experimental results indicate that the XG Boost algorithm outperforms the other algorithms with the highest coefficient of determination value of 0.9634. This value demonstrates that the XG Boost algorithm provides the most accurate predictions for surface roughness compared to other algorithms. The study also provides a comparative analysis of the performance of all the algorithms used in this study, along with insights derived from Explainable AI techniques.

Keywords

Additive Manufacturing; Explainable Artificial Intelligence; Machine Learning; Supervised Learning; Surface Roughness; Structural Integrity

Subject

Engineering, Mechanical Engineering

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.