Version 1
: Received: 12 April 2023 / Approved: 13 April 2023 / Online: 13 April 2023 (02:36:37 CEST)
Version 2
: Received: 26 April 2023 / Approved: 27 April 2023 / Online: 27 April 2023 (02:54:32 CEST)
Schneider, S.; Zelger, T.; Sengl, D.; Baptista, J. A Quantitative Positive Energy District Definition with Contextual Targets. Buildings2023, 13, 1210.
Schneider, S.; Zelger, T.; Sengl, D.; Baptista, J. A Quantitative Positive Energy District Definition with Contextual Targets. Buildings 2023, 13, 1210.
Schneider, S.; Zelger, T.; Sengl, D.; Baptista, J. A Quantitative Positive Energy District Definition with Contextual Targets. Buildings2023, 13, 1210.
Schneider, S.; Zelger, T.; Sengl, D.; Baptista, J. A Quantitative Positive Energy District Definition with Contextual Targets. Buildings 2023, 13, 1210.
Abstract
This paper presents the goals and components of a quantitative energy balance assessment framework to define PEDs flexibly in three important contexts: the context of the district's density and RES potential, the context of a district's location, induced mobility and the context of the dis-trict's future environment and its decarbonized energy demand or supply. It starts by introducing the practical goals of this definition approach: achievable, yet sufficiently ambitious to be inline with Paris 2050 for most urban and rural Austrian district typologies. It goes on to identify the main design parts of the definition: system boundaries, balancing weights and balance targets and argue how they can be linked to the definition goals in detail. In particular we specify three levels of system boundaries and argue their individual necessity: operation, including everyday mobili-ty, including embodied energy and emissions. It argues that all three pillars of PEDs, energy effi-ciency, onsite renewables and energy flexibility can be assessed with the single metric of a prima-ry energy balance when using carefully designed, time-dependent conversion factors. Finally, it is discussed how balance targets can be interpreted as information and requirements from the sur-rounding energy system, which we identify as a "context factor". Three examples of such context factors, each corresponding to the balance target of one of the previously defined system bounda-ries operation, mobility and embodied emissions are presented: Density (as a context of opera-tion), sectoral energy balances and location (as a context for mobility) and an outlook of a person-al emission budgets (as a context for embodied emissions). Finally, the proposed definition framework is applied to seven distinct district typologies in Austria and discussed in terms of its design goals.
Keywords
Positive energy districts; PED definition; Context Factors; energy balance assessment
Subject
Environmental and Earth Sciences, Sustainable Science and Technology
Copyright:
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Commenter: Simon Schneider
Commenter's Conflict of Interests: Author