4. Determining the length of n - lines in a triangle and their properties
Fermat's Last Theorem states that for any natural number n>2 the equation has no solutions in non-zero integers a, b, c.
In the article [
3] “Towards the proof of Fermat's theorem”, we showed that the solution of this problem is adequate to finding ΔABC with integer sides a, b, c, for which
, where natural n more than two (n > 2).
Consider the problem of dividing the sides of a triangle proportionally n-th powers of adjacent sides [
1,
2,
5].
Let ΔABC be given with corresponding sides a, b, c. Let's draw a straight-line CD from vertex C to side AB.
All three n-lines intersect at one point, which is easily proved by the Ceva’s theorem.
Consider the following problem. Let the lengths of the sides of the triangle be integers. Let's determine for what values of n the points of intersection of the lines of n - straight lines lie on the midline.
As is known, the point “k” belongs to the n-line CD if and only if the distances from “k” to sides
a and
b are proportional to the
(n-1)-th powers of these sides (see
Figure 1), i.e.
For clarity, we present the proof of this statement.
Let the angles at the vertex C be
and
Then
Let's carry out the following transformations:
On the other hand, S
ΔACD=1/2·h·AD, S
ΔBCD=1/2·h·BD, where
h is the height drawn from vertex C to side AB. Then, using the relations
, we get
And now let the point K be the point of intersection of n-lines drawn from different vertices, and the points M, L, N based on the perpendiculars drawn to the corresponding sides a, b, c. Using the previous formula, we can get the following formula
After doing some transformations, we get:
Let this point lie on the midline parallel to side c. Then
What does the last formula mean? For n=0 it has 1+1≠1, i.e. the point of intersection of the medians cannot lie on the midline. For n=1 we have a+b=c, which contradicts the triangle inequality. That is, the point of intersection of the bisectors also cannot lie on the midline.
For
n=2 we get a right triangle because
As is known, Only the Simedians of the rectangular triangle intersect in the middle of the height and
, where
If we assume that the point K is in the middle of the CD-line of n-lines, then we can write the following equality: (see
Figure 2).
On the other hand, by the property of the n-straight lines
Given the formulas (14) in (13), we get:
or
It should be noted that the same result can be obtained by comparing the formulas:
and.
we get: And for all values n formulas (16) are true? With n = 2, as we have already noted, a rectangular triangle is obtained.
And formulas are true.
To get a unambiguous answer to this question with n > 2, we first get formulas for N-straight lengths. To do this, we use the Stuart formula.
Let
Then according to the Stuart formula (see
Figure 3)
On the other hand, after the substitution of values for AD and DB we have:
By substituting (19) in (18) and conducting some transformations, we have:
Similar formulas can be obtained for the other two Simedians:
Let us show that these formulas can be used to obtain formulas for the median, bisector and symmedian of the triangle ∆ABC
For n=0, from formula (20) we obtain the median formula:
For n=1, we get the bisector formula:
For n=2, we get the formula for the symmedian:
The formula for the length of n-lines in a triangle in which
can be written as follows:
And now we will show that in a triangle in which the n-line CD=Lc is drawn, where the equality holds, formulas (16) are true only for n=2.
Indeed, this can be obtained if we consider ∆ACD and ∆BCD
First consider the triangle ∆ACD
For the triangle ∆ACD, we write the cosine theorem and instead of cosα, we substitute the value from formula (19) substituting we get
The cosine theorem has the following form:
Substituting the values of AD and cosα, we obtain:
Similarly, from the triangle ∆ACB we have:
Equating equations (29) and (30), we obtain:
The left side of the last equation is divisible by c, then the right side must also be divisible by c, which contradicts this condition.
Hence n = 2.
And now we will show geometrically that the equalities аn + bn = cn and
acosβ+bcosα = c are satisfied for cosβ = cosα = only for n = 2, and at the same time the line of n-straight lines СН ⊥ АВ.
We have already shown that to satisfy the equality
where
a, b, c and
n are natural numbers, the following equalities must be satisfied:
That is: a = c⇒ a On the other hand, all these formulas are written for the triangle ABC with sides a, b, c and corresponding angles α, β, γ, for which the equality: acosβ + bcosα=c
Comparing the formulas, the last formulas can be written: cosβ =
cosα =
Let's transform these formulas. All trigonometric expressions obtained for angles α, α
1 α
2 will be true for angles β, β
1, β
2. Thus we get:
To visualize the application of the last equality, let's draw a triangle ABC' (ΔABC'=ΔABC), which is symmetrical to the triangle ABC with respect to the side AB (see
Figure 5)
As we can see from the previous formula, the ratio of the sines should be
.
Then = Since = and only when ВВ' ⊥ АС
СМ=МН=НМ'=М'С', then
=
only then the line of n straight lines is perpendicular to the base (for n = 2) (see
Figure 6).
Let us show that for n >2 the ratio of sines is not equal to.
Indeed, .
Thus, when n >2 cosα ≠In a triangle, side CF faces an obtuse angle, i.e. she is the biggest side.
Here СМ = MD =. DF=DE+EF
Since CD=DE=
, тo DF=
+ EF. That is DF >
Thus, we get that,
and
only when
n=2. However, the cosines
take values close respectively to the values
and
Let's write the following expressions:
Here
and
are functions of positive integers
a,b,c and
n. Let us determine the values of these functions. To do this, from the triangles
∆ACD and
∆BCD we find cosα and cosβ in the following form:
We substitute in (32) and (33) the value derived from (26)
we get:
and
where
As seen, for
n=2 we have:
Then That is, for a right triangle, everything is correct. Now suppose that n>2, nϵN.
In this case, substituting (31) into (15), we obtain the equality
Thus, for any integer triangular numbers a, b, c and natural powers of n, we can find such functions and , which, when formulated, give equality (36).
If we pay attention to the functions (34) and (35), we see that for natural values of a, b, c and n, the functions f_1 and f_2 must be rational. This can also be seen from (36).
Now suppose that there are values n(n>2) under which the condition is satisfied, that is, such values and , under which the following conditions were simultaneously met:
Then, subtracting the first from the equation from the second, we get
or
Where we get
Now we can get the following expression:
Formulas (37) and (38) can be written as:
They can also be presented, for example, as:
Let's note:
1) For n=2, that is, when the triangle is right-angled, regardless of a, b, c, we get Then the expression can have positive integer solutions for a, b, c.
2) With a=b, that is, when the triangle is isosceles, regardless of a, b, c, we get . However, then we have and , this case is impossible if a and c are rational.
In formula (36), for an arbitrary triangle, an equality is obtained in which a, b, c, n can receive not only integer values, but also any real positive values.
And now consider the case for which the line of n-lines is perpendicular to the base of the triangle.
As can be seen from
Figure 5 the projection of “b” on side “c” is
, and the projection of
a on side “c” is
, where
From formula (41) one can also obtain the formula
On the other hand, from formula (34) we have:
If we divide the corresponding sides of these formulas into each other, then we get:
If we divide the corresponding sides of formulas (43) and (42) into each other, then we obtain:
Now consider the n-line CN. As is known:
Formula (34) can be written in the following form:
Let's find the length of NH:
Then the length of the n-line L
c can be found as follows:
And now, using the obtained formulas, we will try to prove some statements related to Fermat's theorem.
As we have already noted, formula (36) is true for any triangle with any positive real sides a,b,c and real values “n”.
As we have noted, and must be rational.
We are only interested in triangles with natural values a, b, c and “n”.
Note also that for positive integer values
a,b,c, the expressions cosα, cosβ, cosγ must be rational. This is clear from the cosine theorem.
From formula (45) we get that this is possible only for
n=k, i.e. equality must hold
On the other hand, as can be seen from formulas (47) and (48), with we have Δ=0.
From (49) we obtain that Lc = hc. That is, by formulas (45), (47), (48) we obtain that
in this case the line of n-straight lines must be perpendicular to the base. Then formula (26) is transformed into the following form
Substituting (54) into (53) we get:
Here k ≥ 2.
Since the numbers a, b, c satisfy the condition then two of them must be odd, and one of them must be an even number.
Then the value of the expression will be a natural number. On the other hand, the left side of equality (55) is divisible by “c”. Therefore, the right side must also be divisible by “c”. Since and are not divisible by “c”, then equality (55) is possible only when 2k – 4 = 0 or when k = 2.
Indeed, for k = 2, formula (55) transforms into the form:
If we simplify this expression, we get:
Which is to be expected.
This can be shown in another way.
As you know, for the triangle ABC, you can write the following equalities:
If formulas (31) are taken into account in the last equalities, then we obtain the following equalities:
As can be easily seen, for f1 = f2 = 1 и γ = 900, we get n = 2, or for n = 2, γ = 900 we get f1 = f2 = 1.
And now we will try to prove that for n ˃ k ˃ 2 and for ,we come to a contradiction.
Formulas (46) are transformed into the following form:
and
Assume that the equality a
n + b
n = c
n holds. Substituting expressions (57) here, we obtain:
The last formula is the relationship between
and
These formulas can also be presented in the following form:
Without proof, we also present the following formulas:
On the other hand, dividing formulas (57) (corresponding sides) by each other, one can obtain
From the last formula, taking into account (45), we obtain
)k
Note also that by substituting formula (37) into (61), we can obtain the equality
From (60) it can be seen that for
(for
n=2) we also get
= c2
However, if
n ˃ 2, then we get
˂ a2
Let's prove these inequalities.
Let n ˃ k ˃ 2 and a
n + b
n = c
n. Whence it turns out: (
)
n + (
)
n = 1. Since in this case
˂1,
˂1, we can write the following inequality:
)n = 1
Therefore, in this case we get a2 + b2 + c2. It follows from the latter that
c
2 – a
2 ˂ b
2, c
2 – b
2 ˂ a
2. Then we have:
= a2
Without proof, we also present the following double inequalities
Now consider the following formula (see 62, 63):
, где f1 ≠ f2 ≠ 1.
As we already noted in (65), for n ˃ k ˃ 2
B ˂ b2 ˂ bk ˂ bn
A ˂ a2 ˂ak ˂ a n
In formula (62), as can be seen from the last inequalities, bk ˃B, ak ˃ A. Therefore, in order to obtain from ()k (i.e., the smallest of large numbers), it is necessary that ()k is reduced by an integer. In other words, it must be that ak = At, bk = Bt. And this is impossible, since b and a are irreducible numbers. Therefore, the number k cannot be an integer or a fractional number, at which the number ()k would become irrational.
Since is the ratio of two integers, it is therefore rational. That is, in any case, if n ˃ k ˃ 2, and the number k is a rational number, then the equality = ()k leads to a contradiction. This contradiction is removed only when n = k = 2 and if k is (for k ˃ 2) an irrational number.