Corion, M.; Santos, S.; De Ketelaere, B.; Spasic, D.; Hertog, M.; Lammertyn, J. Trends in in Ovo Sexing Technologies: Insights and Interpretation from Papers and Patents. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology 2023, 14, doi:10.1186/s40104-023-00898-1.
Corion, M.; Santos, S.; De Ketelaere, B.; Spasic, D.; Hertog, M.; Lammertyn, J. Trends in in Ovo Sexing Technologies: Insights and Interpretation from Papers and Patents. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology 2023, 14, doi:10.1186/s40104-023-00898-1.
Corion, M.; Santos, S.; De Ketelaere, B.; Spasic, D.; Hertog, M.; Lammertyn, J. Trends in in Ovo Sexing Technologies: Insights and Interpretation from Papers and Patents. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology 2023, 14, doi:10.1186/s40104-023-00898-1.
Corion, M.; Santos, S.; De Ketelaere, B.; Spasic, D.; Hertog, M.; Lammertyn, J. Trends in in Ovo Sexing Technologies: Insights and Interpretation from Papers and Patents. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology 2023, 14, doi:10.1186/s40104-023-00898-1.
Abstract
Numerous researchers and institutions have been developing in ovo sexing technologies to improve animal welfare by identifying male embryos in an early embryonic stage and disposing of them before pain perception. This review gives a complete overview of the technological approaches reported in papers and patents by performing a thorough search using Web of Science and Patstat databases for papers and patents, respectively. Based on a total of 45 papers and 100 patent families up until 2021 reported worldwide, 11 technology categories were defined: six non-optical and five optical techniques. Every category was described for its characteristics while assessing its potential for application. Next, the dynamics of the publications of in ovo sexing techniques in both paper and patent fields were described through growth curves, and the interest or actual status was visualized using the number of paper citations and the actual legal status of the patents. When comparing the reported technologies in papers to those in patents, scientific gaps were observed, as some of the patented technologies were not reported in the scientific literature, e.g., ion mobility and mass spectrometry approaches. Generally, more diverse approaches in all categories were found in patents, although they do require more scientific evidence through papers or industrial adoption to prove their robustness. Moreover, although there is a recent trend for non-invasive techniques, invasive methods like analyzing DNA through PCR or hormones through immunosensing are still being reported (and might continue to be) in papers and patents. It was also observed that none of the technologies complies with all the industry requirements. Thus, more research and harmony between consumers, industry, and governments is necessary.
Keywords
In ovo sexing; male day-old chick culling; animal welfare; optical and non-optical techniques; patents and papers
Subject
Biology and Life Sciences, Biology and Biotechnology
Copyright:
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
,
