Version 1
: Received: 9 March 2023 / Approved: 14 March 2023 / Online: 14 March 2023 (06:14:00 CET)
How to cite:
Espira, A.; Kefa, C.; Lung, M.; Gregory, A.J. Trees on Farms Provide Both Wood Value and Conservation Value in a Tropical Forest System: A Case Study from Western Kenya. Preprints2023, 2023030247. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202303.0247.v1
Espira, A.; Kefa, C.; Lung, M.; Gregory, A.J. Trees on Farms Provide Both Wood Value and Conservation Value in a Tropical Forest System: A Case Study from Western Kenya. Preprints 2023, 2023030247. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202303.0247.v1
Espira, A.; Kefa, C.; Lung, M.; Gregory, A.J. Trees on Farms Provide Both Wood Value and Conservation Value in a Tropical Forest System: A Case Study from Western Kenya. Preprints2023, 2023030247. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202303.0247.v1
APA Style
Espira, A., Kefa, C., Lung, M., & Gregory, A.J. (2023). Trees on Farms Provide Both Wood Value and Conservation Value in a Tropical Forest System: A Case Study from Western Kenya. Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202303.0247.v1
Chicago/Turabian Style
Espira, A., Mark Lung and Andrew J. Gregory. 2023 "Trees on Farms Provide Both Wood Value and Conservation Value in a Tropical Forest System: A Case Study from Western Kenya" Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202303.0247.v1
Abstract
A primary challenge facing conservationists is reconciling the human needs of forest adjacent communities with the needs of conserving forest biodiversity, especially in tropical regions with growing populations of rural poor. Agroforestry has the potential to simultaneously provide for human needs and enhance forest biodiversity, but the complex interactions and feedbacks between the social and natural dimensions are relatively undescribed and thus systematic implementation is rare. The attributes of trees on farms required for human needs and conservation value may conflict. For example, exotic species in monoculture may provide the most economic value for farmers, while relic or planted indigenous tree mixtures may be more valuable for biological conservation. The objective of this study was to explore whether agroforestry practices in a moist tropical forest ecosystem in Kenya can simultaneously provide timber and fuelwood value to small-holder farmers while extending forest tree biodiversity. We described the agroforestry attributes on farms around a tropical forest, assessed the relationship between number and biomass of timber/fuelwood trees and tree biodiversity, and explored the relationships between forest tree diversity attributes and farm tree diversity attributes on a landscape scale using spatial analysis. We found that the diversity and number of trees on farms in this area are extensive yet variable, but that no significant relationship exists between the number of timber/fuelwood trees and tree diversity. This suggests that the two values of agroforestry may not be in conflict, due mainly to the high diversity of trees used for fuelwood. We also found that trees on farms in the larger landscape add to the conservation value of forest tree biodiversity and could be important components in conservation management. If agroforestry is to play an increasingly active role in conserving biodiversity in human-dominated landscapes, particularly in areas of dense subsistence farmer populations, increase recognition needs to be given to farmer’s perception of the value of trees and their selection of what trees to plant or maintain.
Copyright:
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
