Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Post-Processing of Surface Topography Data for As-Built Metal Additive Surface Texture Characterization

Version 1 : Received: 2 March 2023 / Approved: 3 March 2023 / Online: 3 March 2023 (02:04:59 CET)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Buchenau, T., Brüning, H., & Amkreutz, M. (2022). Post-processing of surface topography data for as-built metal additive surface texture characterization. Journal of Additive Manufacturing Technologies, 2(2), 697. https://doi.org/10.18416/JAMTECH.2212697 Buchenau, T., Brüning, H., & Amkreutz, M. (2022). Post-processing of surface topography data for as-built metal additive surface texture characterization. Journal of Additive Manufacturing Technologies, 2(2), 697. https://doi.org/10.18416/JAMTECH.2212697

Abstract

Surfaces of additively manufactured metal parts from powder-based processes typically show powder particle agglomerations and other features, resulting in high surface roughness. Proper characterization of those surfaces is necessary in order to assess part quality with respect to coatability, mechanical performance or corrosion resistance for use in aerospace, automotive, medical and more industrial applications. Optical surface texture measurement allows for collection of areal surface data, while the established contact stylus method only captures line profile data. When applying optical methods for surface topography measurements, proper data acquisition and post-processing in order to assess surface texture may be complex. A number of variables can be adjusted, such as different measurement settings, approaches to outlier removal, evaluated area size or form removal. This work shows the influence of selected z-range prior to measurement and the influence of choosing pre-defined outlier removal settings in MountainsMap 9.2 on selected ISO 25178-2:2022 parameters calculated from data obtained from confocal microscopy for as-built Ti6Al4V from laser powder bed fusion. The aim is to show the influence of variation in measurement and post-processing on calculated surface texture parameters and stress the importance of proper documentation in order to achieve reproducibility of data for quality management.

Keywords

Metal Additive Manufacturing; Laser Powder Bed Fusion; Surface Texture Characteri-zation; Optical Metrology; Confocal Microscopy

Subject

Engineering, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.