Preprint Review Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

The Confound of Hemodynamic Response Function Variability in Resting-State Functional MRI Studies

Version 1 : Received: 28 February 2023 / Approved: 28 February 2023 / Online: 28 February 2023 (09:32:04 CET)

How to cite: Rangaprakash, D.; Barry, R.; Deshpande, G. The Confound of Hemodynamic Response Function Variability in Resting-State Functional MRI Studies. Preprints 2023, 2023020516. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202302.0516.v1 Rangaprakash, D.; Barry, R.; Deshpande, G. The Confound of Hemodynamic Response Function Variability in Resting-State Functional MRI Studies. Preprints 2023, 2023020516. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202302.0516.v1

Abstract

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is an indirect measure of neural activity with the hemodynamic response function (HRF) coupling it with unmeasured neural activity. The HRF, modulated by several non-neural factors, is variable across brain regions, individuals and populations. Yet, a majority of resting-state fMRI connectivity studies continue to assume a non-variable HRF. In this article, with supportive prior evidence, we argue that HRF variability cannot be ignored as it substantially confounds within-subject connectivity estimates and between-subjects connectivity group differences. We also discuss its clinical relevance with connectivity impairments confounded by HRF aberrations in several disorders. We present limited data on HRF differences between women and men, which resulted in a 15.4% median error in functional connectivity estimates in a group-level comparison. We also discuss the implications of HRF variability for fMRI studies in the spinal cord. There is a need for more dialogue within the community on the HRF confound, and we hope that our article is a catalyst in the process.

Keywords

BOLD fMRI; HRF; resting state connectivity; aging; sex differences; confound

Subject

Biology and Life Sciences, Biophysics

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.