Submitted:
17 January 2023
Posted:
18 January 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
3.1. Digital Approach –KABADA Tool
3.2. Self-Assessment of Entrepreneurship by Students
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- KABADA consortium. Start off your business on the right foot. 2022; Available online: http://kabada.ba.lv/#/ (accessed on December 8, 2022).
- Mavlutova, I., Lesinskis, K., Liogys, M., Hermanis, J. Innovative teaching techniques for entrepreneurship education in the era of digitalization. WSEAS Transactions on Environment and Development. 2020; Volume 16, pp. 725–733. [CrossRef]
- Veber, J., Srpová, J. Podnikání malé a střední firmy. Praha, Grada, Czech Republic, 2012.
- Green, F. Youth entrepreneurship. OECD. 2013. Available online: https://www.oecd.org/cfe/leed/youth_bp_finalt.pdf (accessed on November 10, 2022).
- Eurobarometer (2007). Entrepreneurship survey of the EU (25 Member States), United States, Iceland and Norway. Available online: https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/560 (accessed on October 15, 2022).
- Mascherini, M. et al. Youth entrepreneurship in Europe: Values, attitudes, policies, Eurofound. 2015. Available online: https://policycommons.net/artifacts/1841442/youth-entrepreneurship-in-europe/2584928/ (accessed on January 2, 2023).
- Tosun, J., Mierina, I., Shore, J., Atci, M., Hörisch, F. Youth Entrepreneurship in Europe. 2016. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jale-Tosun/publication/292286462_Youth_Entrepreneurship_in_Europe/links/56ac894d08ae28588c5f36e9/Youth-Entrepreneurship-in-Europe.pdf (accessed on October 20, 2022).
- Cañizares, S. S., García, F. F. Gender differences in entrepreneurial attitudes. Equality, Diversity & Inclusion, 2010; Volume 29(8), pp.766-786. [CrossRef]
- Koellinger, P., Minniti, M., Schade, C. Gender Differences in Entrepreneurial Propensity. Oxford Bulletin Of Economics And Statistics, 2013; Volume 75(2), pp. 213-234. [CrossRef]
- Lukeš, M., Jakl, M., Zouhar, J. (2014). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2013. 2014. Podnikatelská aktivita v České republice. Praha: TACR, MPO, GEM, VŠE.
- AMSP ČR. Analýza AMSP ČR. Srovnávací analýza podnikatelů a podnikatelek. 2016. Available online: http://www.amsp.cz/zeny-valcuji-muze-v-poctunove-zalozenychzivnosti?highlightWords=srovn%C3%A1vac%C3%AD+anal%C3%BDza+podnikatel%C5%AF+podnikatelek (accessed on September 10, 2022).
- Jirovská, E. Analýza pozitivních a negativních faktorů působících na zakladatelskou aktivitu v ČR a jejich krajské odlišnosti. 2003; Praha, KUFR.
- Williams, C. C., Round, J., Rodgers, P. Evaluating the motives of informal entrepreneurs: some lessons from Ukraine. Journal Of Developmental Entrepreneurship. 2009; Volume 14(1), pp. 59-71. [CrossRef]
- Staniewski, M., Awruk, K. Motivating Factors and Barriers in the Commencement of One's Own Business for Potential Entrepreneurs. Ekonomska Istrazivanja/Economic Research. 2015; Volume 28(1), pp.583-592. [CrossRef]
- Bučiúniene, I., Kazlauskaité, R. The linkage between HRM, CSR and performance outcomes. Baltic Journal of Management, Oxford: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. 2012; Volume 7. No. 1. , pp. 5 -24. ISSN 1746-5265. [CrossRef]
- Nosratabadi, S., Mosavi, A., Shamshirband, S., Kazimieras Zavadskas, E., Rakotonirainy, A., Chau, K. W. Sustainable business models: A review. Sustainability. 2019; Volume 11(6), 1663. [CrossRef]
- Vrabcová, P., Smolová, H., Urbancová, H., Fajčíková, A. Strategie bioekonomiky pro udržitelnou Evropu a iniciativa BioEast. Prameny a studie. 2019; Volume 64, pp. 17–28.
- Orecchini, F., Valitutti, V., Vitali, G. Industry and academia for a transition towards sustainability: advancing sustainability science through university–business collaborations. Sustainability science. 2012; Volume 7(1), pp. 57–73. [CrossRef]
- Ahi, P., Searcy, C. A comparative literature analysis of definitions for green and sustainable supply chain management. Journal of cleaner production. 2013; Volume 52, pp. 329–341. [CrossRef]
- Hájek, M., Kubová, P. Identification of Basic Trends in Public Expenditures of Environmental Protection in the Czech Republic. In Theoretical and Practical Aspects of Public Finance 2016. 2016; pp. 146–155.
- Teece, D. J. Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic management journal. 2007; Volume 28(13), pp. 1319–1350. [CrossRef]
- Wichaisri, S., Sopadang, A. Trends and future directions in sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 2018. Volume 26(1), pp. 1–17. [CrossRef]
- Zemigala, M. Tendencies in research on sustainable development in management sciences. Journal of Cleaner Production 2019; Volume 218, pp. 796–809. [CrossRef]
- Hummels, H., Argyrou, A. Planetary demands: Redefining sustainable development and sustainable entrepreneurship. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2021; Volume 278, 123804. [CrossRef]
- Salmivaara, V., Kibler, E. “Rhetoric Mix” of Argumentations: How Policy Rhetoric Conveys Meaning of Entrepreneurship for Sustainable Development. 2020. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 2020; Volume 44, Issue 4, pp. 700-732. 1042258719845345. [CrossRef]
- Patzelt, H., & Shepherd, D. A. Recognizing opportunities for sustainable development. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 2011; Volume 35(4), pp. 631–652. [CrossRef]
- Kuckertz, A., Wagner, M. The influence of sustainability orientation on entrepreneurial intentions—Investigating the role of business experience. Journal of business venturing. 2010; Volume 25(5), pp. 524–539. [CrossRef]
- Vrabcová, P., Urbancová, H. The Approach of Czech Business entities to the promotion and application of the corporate social responsibility. In Hradecké ekonomické dny. 2021. Volume 11(1), pp. 870–880. [CrossRef]
- Lüdeke-Freund, F. Towards a conceptual framework of business models for sustainability. In Knowledge collaboration & learning for sustainable innovation; Wever, R., Quist, J. Tukker,A. Woudstra, J., Boons, F. Beute,N. eds., Delft, NL, 2010; pp. 25–29.
- Geissdoerfer, M., Vladimirova, D., Evans, S. Sustainable business model innovation: A review. Journal of cleaner production. 2018; Volume 198, pp. 401–416. [CrossRef]
- Veleva, V., Hart, M., Greiner, T., Crumbley, C. Indicators of sustainable production. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2001; Volume 9(5), pp. 447–452. [CrossRef]
- Schaltegger, S., Lüdeke-Freund, F., Hansen, E. G. Business cases for sustainability: the role of business model innovation for corporate sustainability. International journal of innovation and sustainable development. 2012; Volume 6(2), pp. 95–119. [CrossRef]
- Geissdoerfer, M., Bocken, N. M., Hultink, E. J. (2016). Design thinking to enhance the sustainable business modelling process–A workshop based on a value mapping process. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2016. Volume 135, pp. 1218–1232. [CrossRef]
- Todeschini, B. V., Cortimiglia, M. N., Callegaro-de-Menezes, D., Ghezzi, A. Innovative and sustainable business models in the fashion industry: Entrepreneurial drivers, opportunities, and challenges. Business Horizons. 2017; Volume 60(6), pp. 759–770. [CrossRef]
- Smolová, H., Kubová, P., Urbancová, H. Success factors for start-ups related to agriculture, food and nutrition and their relevance to education. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis. 2018; Volume 66(3), pp. 791–801. [CrossRef]
- Powell, M., Osborne, S. P. Can marketing contribute to sustainable social enterprise? Social Enterprise Journal. 2015. [CrossRef]
- Cooney, S. Build a green small business: Profitable ways to become an ecopreneur. 2009. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
- Baumgartner, R. J. Organizational culture and leadership: Preconditions for the development of a sustainable corporation. Sustainable development. 2009; Volume 17(2), pp. 102–113. [CrossRef]
- Ciccullo, F., Pero, M., Caridi, M., Gosling, J., Purvis, L. Integrating the environmental and social sustainability pillars into the lean and agile supply chain management paradigms: A literature review and future research directions. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2018; Volume 172, pp. 2336–2350. [CrossRef]
- Klarin, T. The concept of sustainable development: From its beginning to the contemporary issues. Zagreb International Review of Economics and Business. 2018. Volume 21(1), pp. 67–94. [CrossRef]
- Fortunati, S., Morea, D., Mosconi, E. M. Circular economy and corporate social responsibility in the agricultural system: Cases study of the Italian agri-food industry. Agricultural Economics. 2020; Volume 66(11), pp. 489–498. [CrossRef]
- Vrabcová, P., Urbancová, H. The Approach of Czech Business entities to the promotion and application of the corporate social responsibility. In Hradecké ekonomické dny. 2021; Volume 11(1), pp. 870–880. [CrossRef]
- Vrabcová, P., Urbancová, H. Approaches of selected organizations in the Czech Republic to promoting the concept of sustainable development and corporate social responsibility. Agricultural Economics. 2021; Volume 67(7), pp. 255–265. [CrossRef]
- Leung, X. Y., Xue, L., & Wen, H. Framing the sharing economy: Toward a sustainable ecosystem. Tourism Management. 2019; Volume 71, pp. 44–53. [CrossRef]
- Coccia, M. Measuring the impact of sustainable technological innovation. International Journal of Technology Intelligence and Planning. 2009; Volume 5(3), pp. 276–288. [CrossRef]
- Franceschelli, M. V., Santoro, G., Candelo, E. Business model innovation for sustainability: a food start-up case study. British Food Journal. 2018; Volume 120, Number 10, pp. 2483-2494. [CrossRef]
- Sengupta, M. Transformational Change or Tenuous Wish List? A Critique of SDG 1 ('End Poverty in All Its Forms Everywhere'). Social Alternatives. 2018; Volume 37(1), pp. 12–17.
- Kang, K., Wang, M., Luan, X. Decision-making and coordination with government subsidy and fairness concerns in poverty alleviation supply chain. Computers & Industrial Engineering. 2020; Volume 152, February 2021, 107058. [CrossRef]
- Cobbinah, P. B., Erdiaw-Kwasie, M. O., Amoateng, P. Rethinking sustainable development within the framework of poverty and urbanisation in developing countries. Environmental Development. 2015; Volume 13, pp. 18–32. [CrossRef]
- Baumgartner, R. J., & Rauter, R. Strategic perspectives of corporate sustainability management to develop a sustainable organization. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2017, Volume 140, pp. 81–92. [CrossRef]
- Sengupta, S., Sahay, A. Comparing mission statements of social enterprises and corporate enterprises in the new and renewable energy sector of India: a computer aided content analysis study. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research. 2017; Volume 7:21, pp. 1-16. [CrossRef]
- Porter, M.E. How Competitive Forces Shape Strategy. Harvard Business Review. 1979; Volume 57/2, pp. 137–145.
- Osterwalder, A. What is a business model? 2005. Available online: Business-model-design.blogspot.com. Archived from the original from 2006 (accessed on October 2022).
- Kuuluvainen, J., Karppinen, H., Ovaskainen, V. Landowner objectives and nonindustrial private timber supply. Forest Science. 1996; Volume 42(3), pp. 300-309.
- Ní Dhubháin, Á., Cobanova, R., Karppinen, H., Mizaraite, D., Ritter, E., Slee, B., Wall, S. The values and objectives of private forest owners and their influence on forestry behaviour: the implications for entrepreneurship. Small-scale Forestry. 2007; Volume 6(4), pp. 347-357. [CrossRef]
- D'Amato, D., Veijonaho, S., Toppinen, A. Towards sustainability? Forest-based circular bioeconomy business models in Finnish SMEs. Forest policy and economics. 2020; Volume 110, 101848. [CrossRef]
- Pelli, P., Haapala, A., Pykäläinen, J. (2017). Services in the forest-based bioeconomy–analysis of European strategies. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research. 2017; Volume 32(7), pp. 559-567. [CrossRef]
- Šálka, J., Longauer, R., Lacko, M. The effects of property transformation on forestry entrepreneurship and innovation in the context of Slovakia. Forest Policy and Economics. 2006; Volume 8(7), pp. 716-724. [CrossRef]
- Niskanen, A., Lunnan, A., Ota, I., Blatner, K., Herbohn, J., Bull, L., Hickey, G. M. Policies affecting forestry entrepreneurship. Small-scale Forestry. 2007; Volume 6(3), pp. 233-255. [CrossRef]
- Šporčić, M., Landekić, M., Papa, I., Lepoglavec, K., Nevečerel, H., Seletković, A., Bakarić, M. Current status and perspectives of forestry entrepreneurship in Croatia. South-east European forestry: SEEFOR. 2017; Volume 8(1), pp. 21-29. [CrossRef]
- Hansen, E. Responding to the bioeconomy: Business model innovation in the forest sector. In Environmental impacts of traditional and innovative forest-based bioproducts. 2016, pp. 227-248. Springer, Singapore.
- Manninen, K., Koskela, S., Antikainen, R., Bocken, N., Dahlbo, H., Aminoff, A. Do circular economy business models capture intended environmental value propositions? Journal of Cleaner Production. 2018; Volume 171, pp. 413-422. [CrossRef]
- Reim, W., Sjödin, D., Parida, V., Rova, U., Christakopoulos, P. Bio-economy based business models for the forest sector. A systematic literature review. In International scientific conference RURAL DEVELOPMENT 2017. 2017; pp. 775-780. [CrossRef]
- Korhonen, J., Hurmekoski, E., Hansen, E., Toppinen, A. Firm-level competitiveness in the forest industries: Review and research implications in the context of bioeconomy strategies. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 2018; Volume 48(2), pp. 141-152. [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
