IV. THE RELAXATION DYNAMICS IN THE ZONE DURING THE SHOCK REFLECTION
The initial temperature distribution function obtained in the relaxation zone behind a shock propagating free in the incident medium, let’s denote it
f0, is given in terms of a distance
x from the front, and is defined up to the moment when the shock front hits the interface. As the front advances into the hotter medium, the continued relaxation in the gas in front of the interface results in the parameter distribution being dependent on the interaction time
t. The temporal change of the initial distribution function
f0 at the point of reflection is equivalent to its shift to the right with the shock wave speed
Vsw, at the distance ∆ =
Vsw t (
Figure 4). As seen in the diagram, at a current time
t and a location
x within the relaxation layer
, the shift results in a transition from the initial function
f0 (
x, t) to that at the distance
xi =
x+∆, i.e.
f0 (
x, t) →
f(
xi, t) =
f0 (
x+∆, t), thus yielding a new distribution
Counting the distance
x to the left from the origin, as shown in the graph of
Figure 4, the value of
x at the point of reflection becomes fixed,
x = 0, and thus the parameter distribution in the zone is a function of time only,
. Then, using this function in the refraction equation (2), a non-stationary solution for the normalized pressure
πr in the reflected wave can be found. The temporal change in the distribution
πr occurs during the transitional period
,
tλ is the relaxation time. After that, a stationary state corresponding to a new equilibrium established at the end of the relaxation zone in the gas takes place again.
In most of the applications involving the shock-plasma interaction, the state of a transmitted shock is of primary interest while the reflected portion of the wave is considered as a loss of the shock’s energy. For this case, the equation (2) can be transformed for the transmitted shock distribution πt as the variable using the pressure continuity condition (4), or the solution can be obtained from already determined πr utilizing the same continuity condition.
An illustration to the solution of the equation (2) was done for particular conditions, the shock Mach number
Mi = 3.5 in
N2 at 5000
K, for which the incident shock temperature profile (5) can be utilized. Numerical results for the flow parameter distribution in the relaxation zones across the head of the rarefaction wave fan (in the reflected wave) and across the front of the transmitted shock are presented in the
Figure 5. The pressure distribution across the transmitted wave
πt is obtained using the condition (4), and the temperature distribution
T21(t) - using the relation (9).
As seen in the graphs, visible modifications in the relaxation zone parameters in both, the reflected and transmitted waves take place. The most changes occur for the relaxation time and the relaxation depth values while, in general, the parameter profiles keep the shapes similar to that of the incident wave.
Comparing the data in the
Figure 5 to the incident shock profiles in the
Figure 3, significant shortening, around 50%, of the relaxation time in the transmitted wave is present, along with noticeably smaller differences between the asymptotic temperatures,
T21 -
T31, and pressures,
π2 – π3 attributable to the relaxation depth.
The
flow speed distribution in the relaxation zones of the incident and transmitted shocks can be analyzed considering the mass and momentum conservation laws across the shock and the two continuity conditions across the interface. The expressions for the flow speed can be readily obtained as the functions of the key variable
πr, and then for the two waves of interest
In determining the flow parameters inside the relaxation zone of the reflected rarefaction wave, the following simplifications and approximations can be utilized. First, because at the instant of reflection the incident shock is moving with a constant speed and the transmitted shock’s acceleration caused by the density drop at the interface is virtually instant, the theory of a centered rarefaction wave can be a good approximation. Second, the media extension on both sides of the interface can be assumed here as unlimited. However the character of solution will remain valid even though the gas in the incident medium does not extend to the left from the interface to infinity but rather has a boundary at some coordinate
x =
xb [
13]. The presence of such a boundary will not affect the flow until the time when the head of the rarefaction wave reaches the left-hand boundary at the time
tb =
xb/
c0, where
c0 is the speed of sound in the media in front of the reflected wave. Then the relations of the model are applicable if the relaxation time for the incident shock is shorter than the time
tb . In this case the expression for the flow speed at the head of the expansion fan in the relaxation zone of the reflected rarefaction wave takes the form
from which it follows that the flow distribution during the transitional period is determined by the pressure and temperature distributions in the relaxation zones of the reflected and incident waves.
Applying the relations (12, 13) for the same incident flow conditions as in the
Figure 5, the flow speed distribution for the three waves participating in the interaction can be obtained. A trend similar to that in the
Figure 5 can be seen by comparing the flow speed profiles of the
Figure 6 for the incident and transmitted shocks,
ui and
ut, and that for the rarefaction wave
ur at the head of the expansion fan. Similarly to the structure typical for the temperature and pressure profiles in the
Figure 5, the flow speed for both waves emerging on the interface show reduced relaxation depths compared to that in the incident wave, and the most notably – significant shortening, around 20%, of the relaxation time in the transmitted wave.
The temperature change in the relaxation zone during the transitional period can be determined using the first Riemann invariant
r attributed to a wave of rarefaction,
where
is the pressure function, from which
In the relations (14, 15), the subscript “0” refers to the medium of the rarefaction wave propagation, and the speed of sound is determined using the distribution functions for the flow speed
ur and normalized temperature profile in the nonequilibrium zone behind the incident shock
fT (
x),
where
. The classical centered-wave theory is developed for a perfect gas characterized by a constant specific heat and, at the present problem conditions, needs to be corrected for real-gas effects. In the derivations, the expressions taken along the
J+ characteristic [
13] are applied to a gas in any thermodynamic state, but later the correction to the speed of sound value can be done in the expression for flow speed
u. The factor
σ in the adjustment includes the specific heat correction due to the temperature, the virial correction taking into account inter-molecular interactions that is the function of temperature and pressure, and the correction accounting for relaxation processes leading to acoustical dispersion and is a function of temperature, pressure and frequency [
10].
Using the relations (15, 16), numerical calculations for the temperature in the relaxation zone at the head of the reflected wave were done for particular problem conditions, and the results are presented in the
Figure 5a. According to the data, the relaxation time in the zone of the reflected wave is left unchanged, however the relaxation depth is significantly lowered making the wave structure weaker.
For easier comparison of the profile parameters in the relaxation zones for the three waves, all the key characteristics of data in Figs. 3a, 5 and 6 is collected in the
Table 1. Because of the incident shock energy splitting between that in the reflected and transmitted waves, the changes in the zone parameters are considered relative to their corresponding values in the incident wave. Based on the above results, the analysis of the nonequilibrium zone evolution during the interaction will be done in terms of the relaxation time
tλ, and the relaxation depth
DT . The latter is defined through the gas parameters at the two ends of the relaxation zone, immediately behind the shock front (index “2”) and at the location where a new state of equilibrium is established (index”3”). Then, for the extended temperature jump in the Equation (6)
and similarly for the pressure,
, and the flow speed
, each of them being applicable to the incident, reflected, or transmitted waves.
Analyzing the data, the following processes explaining the specifics of relaxation in the gas must be considered. The excitation of vibrations in the gas compressed by the shock wave and increase with time in the vibrational energy component result in continuous decrease in the gas temperature across the relaxation zone of the incident wave (
DT = 0.432,
Table 1 and
Figure 3-a), and a moderate gas compression (
Dp = 0.103,
Figure 3-b,c), the feature commonly observed in real gases [
17]. The effect mostly shows up in the gas density, for which the relaxation depth is almost five times stronger than for the pressure (0.103 vs 0.490 accordingly) and similarly to that for the temperature. The additional compression built up across the zone drives an increase in the flow speed
ui with time (0.061), in a degree comparable to that for the pressure. The relaxation time around 0.150
μs is common for all the three gas parameters.
In the reflected rarefaction wave, the “compression” in the zone across the head of the expansion fan, which is the inverse to πr, also increases with time (Dπ(i) = 0.048) thus fortifying the wave, along with a very slight decrease in the temperature (DT(r) = 0.004). A stronger effect on the flow speed ur (Du(r) = 0.141) is the result of an increasing with time compression in the zone acting in the same direction with the motion of the gas flow within the rarefaction wave structure.
For the transmitted wave, overall, the parameter distributions in its relaxation zone follows that in the incident wave, however the relaxation proceeds in somewhat weaker degree. A slower temperature decrease with time (Dt = 0.186 vs 0.432) resulting in additional weaker compression in the zone (Dp = 0.059 vs 0.103) drives the flow speed acceleration (Du = 0.038 vs 0.061). Another remarkable effect on relaxation in the transmitted wave is significantly reduced, by 20 to 50%, relaxation times in the profiles (120-100 μs vs 150 μs). However, accounting for acceleration of the transmitted shock in the hotter gas, the relaxation length in this medium makes up its original value in the zone of the incident wave.