Submitted:
05 January 2023
Posted:
06 January 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
- a)
- General functional athlete readiness (GFAR), which characterizes the general physical development and endurance;
- b)
- Special functional athlete readiness (SFAR) depending on the kinds of sport.
2. Methods
- 1)
- Additional work or rest during educational training camp;
- 2)
- Preventive measures;
- 3)
- Using of the selective methods of restoring the functions of ATP-system, Aerobic- and Anaerobic-system;
- 4)
- Plan of correction of a medical and biological providing and a pharmacological protection in extreme conditions of sport.
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusion
Author Statement
Declaration of Competing Interest
Acknowledgements
References
- He, R. Flexible Miniaturized Sensor Technologies for Long-Term Physiological Monitoring. Npj Flex. Electron. 2022, 6, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seshadri, D. R. Wearable sensors for monitoring the internal and external workload of the athlete. NPJ Digit. Med. 2019, 2, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nelson, M. J. Optimisation of assessment of maximal rate of heart rate increase for tracking training-induced changes in endurance exercise performance. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Урюпин, Н. , Савoстьянoв, В. & Алехнoвич, А. Общая и специальная пoдгoтoвленнoсть хoккеистoв. Метoдическoе Рукoвoдствo Для Тренерoв Нациoнальных Сбoрных Кoманд, (2014) https://fhr.ru/upload/iblock/24d/obshaya-i-spec-funkc-podgotovlennost.pdf.
- Malikov, M. Modern and methodic approaches to express-assessment of functional preparation of highly qualified athletes. J. Phys. Educ. Sport 2019, 19, 1513–1518. [Google Scholar]
- Janssen Peter, G. Training Lactate Pulse-Rate By Electro Polar. ( 1987.
- Janssen, P. G. Lactate threshold training. (Elsevier, 2001).
- Patterson, R. P. Fundamentals of impedance cardiography. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag. 1989, 8, 35–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Woltjer, H. , Bogaard, H. & De Vries, P. The technique of impedance cardiography: a review. Eur. Heart J. 1997, 18, 1396–1403. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Jensen, L. , Yakimets, J. & Teo, K. K. A review of impedance cardiography. Heart Lung 1995, 24, 183–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cotter, G. , Schachner, A., Sasson, L., Dekel, H. & Moshkovitz, Y. Impedance cardiography revisited. Physiol. Meas. 2006, 27, 817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chabchoub, S. , Mansouri, S. & Ben Salah, R. Signal processing techniques applied to impedance cardiography ICG signals–a review. J. Med. Eng. Technol. 2022, 46, 243–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Grimnes, S. Bioimpedance and Bioelectricity Basics. (Elsevier, 2014).
- Prutchi, David. & Norris, Michael. Design and development of medical electronic instrumentation : a practical perspective of the design, construction, and test of medical devices, 461 (Wiley-Interscience, 2005).

| Indicators | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|
| The intensity of the performed exercise (M, %)* | ≥ 85 | A |
| 80-84.9 | B | |
| 75-79.9 | C | |
| ≤ 74.9 | D | |
| Target heart rate of the transition to completely anaerobic zone (HRM, bpm)* | ≥ 171 | A |
| 161-170 | B | |
| 151-160 | C | |
| ≤ 150 | D | |
| General functional athlete readiness (GFAR, units)* | ≥ 3.5 | A |
| 3.0-3.4 | B | |
| 2.5-2.9 | C | |
| ≤ 2.4 | D | |
| Coefficient Anaerobic Capacity (CANAC Q, beats) | ≥ 10.1 | A |
| 7.5-10 | B | |
| 5.5-7.4 | C | |
| ≤ 5.4 | D |
| Indicators | 1st series | 2nd series | 3rd series | 4th series | 5th series |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HRstart, bpm | 102,8±13,6 | 137,1±15,7 | 144,4±17,9 | 148,2±15,1 | 152,1±16,2 |
| HRfinish, bpm | 158,4±15,7 | 167,9±14,7 | 173,1±11,9 | 173,9±11,6 | 176,8±11,9 |
| BRstart, rpm | 17,1±6,9 | 19,4±4,7 | 22,1±5,7 | 23,4±4,7 | 24,1±6,0 |
| BRfinish, rpm | 33,7±6,5 | 35,1±5,1 | 37,6±7,2 | 39,5±7,9 | 40,0±7,6 |
| M, % | 66,7±8,4 | 65,9±7,2 | 67,7±5,9 | 67,2±7,1 | 68,4±7,0 |
| HRM, bpm | 129,5±18,1 | 134,7±17,4 | 134,7±17,4 | 140,1±15,7 | 143,4±15,7 |
| GFAR, units | 2,51±0,70 | 2,48±0,63 | 2,59±0,64 | 2,54±0,60 | 2,61±0,57 |
| CANAC Q, beats | 5,7±1,29 | 5,9±0,87 | 5,7±1,13 | 5,4±0,92 | 5,5±0,99 |
| Indicators | 1st series | 2nd series | 3rd series | 4th series | 5th series |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M, % | r=0,50 p<0,01 |
r=0,41 p<0,01 |
r=0,18 p>0,05 |
r=0,09 p>0,05 |
r=0,02 p>0,05 |
| HRM, bpm | r=0,55 p<0,01 |
r=0,40 p<0,01 |
r=0,19 p>0,05 |
r=0,08 p>0,05 |
r=0,04 p>0,05 |
| GFAR, units | r=0,53 p<0,01 |
r=0,51 p<0,01 |
r=0,38 p<0,05 |
r=0,29 p>0,05 |
r=0,33 p>0,05 |
| Indicators | Group in full (n=80) | Degree of correlation with CANAC Q |
|---|---|---|
| M, % | 67,2±7,2 | r=0,241; p<0,01 |
| HRM, bpm | 137,5±17,1 | r=0,237; p<0,01 |
| GFAR, units | 2,55±0,63 | r=0,406; p<0,01 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).