Preprint Review Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

A Review of Online Classification Performance in Motor Imagery-based Brain-Computer Interfaces for Neurorehabilitation

Version 1 : Received: 26 November 2022 / Approved: 29 November 2022 / Online: 29 November 2022 (08:44:36 CET)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Vavoulis, A.; Figueiredo, P.; Vourvopoulos, A. A Review of Online Classification Performance in Motor Imagery-Based Brain–Computer Interfaces for Stroke Neurorehabilitation. Signals 2023, 4, 73-86. Vavoulis, A.; Figueiredo, P.; Vourvopoulos, A. A Review of Online Classification Performance in Motor Imagery-Based Brain–Computer Interfaces for Stroke Neurorehabilitation. Signals 2023, 4, 73-86.

Abstract

Motor imagery(MI)-based Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCI) have shown increased potential for the rehabilitation of stroke patients; nonetheless, their implementation in clinical practice has been restricted due to their low accuracy performance. To date, although a lot of research has been made in benchmarking and highlighting the most valuable classification algorithms in BCI configurations, most of them are using offline data and not from real BCI performance during the closed-loop (or online) sessions. Since rehabilitation training relies on the availability of an accurate feedback system, we surveyed articles of current and past EEG-based BCI frameworks who report the online classification of the movement of two upper limbs in both healthy volunteers and stroke patients. We found that the recently developed Deep Learning methods do not outperform the traditional machine learning algorithms. In addition, patients and healthy subjects exhibit similar classification accuracy in current BCI configurations. Lastly, in terms of neurofeedback modality, Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) yielded the best performance compared to non-FES systems.

Keywords

Brain-Computer Interfaces; Electroencephalogram; Motor-Imagery; Machine Learning; Deep Learning; Classification; Neurorehabilitation

Subject

Computer Science and Mathematics, Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.