Preprint Review Version 2 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Design for Manufacture and Assembly (DfMA) of Digital Fabrication (Dfab) and Additive Manufacturing (AM) in Construction: A Review

Version 1 : Received: 14 November 2022 / Approved: 15 November 2022 / Online: 15 November 2022 (16:05:41 CET)
Version 2 : Received: 10 January 2023 / Approved: 11 January 2023 / Online: 11 January 2023 (11:42:43 CET)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Tuvayanond, W.; Prasittisopin, L. Design for Manufacture and Assembly of Digital Fabrication and Additive Manufacturing in Construction: A Review. Buildings, 2023, 13, 429. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13020429. Tuvayanond, W.; Prasittisopin, L. Design for Manufacture and Assembly of Digital Fabrication and Additive Manufacturing in Construction: A Review. Buildings, 2023, 13, 429. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13020429.

Abstract

Design for Manufacture and Assembly (DfMA) in architectural, engineering, and construction (AEC) industry is attracting the attention of designers, practitioners, and construction project stakeholders. Digital fabrication (Dfab) and design for additive manufacturing (DfAM) practices are found in current needs for further research and development. The DfMA's conceptual function is to maximize the process efficiency of Dfab and AM building projects. This work reviewed 171 relevant research articles over the past few decades. The concept of DfMA and the fundamentals of DfMA in building and construction were explored. In addition, DfMA procedures associated with Dfab and DfAM, as well as its AM assembly process, were discussed. Lastly, the current machine learning research on DfMA in construction was also highlighted. Large research gaps in the DfMA for Dfab and DfAM can be filled to increase operational efficiency and sustainable practices.

Keywords

design for manufacture and assembly; digital fabrication; additive manufacturing, construction, review

Subject

Arts and Humanities, Architecture

Comments (1)

Comment 1
Received: 11 January 2023
Commenter: Lapyote Prasittisopin
Commenter's Conflict of Interests: Author
Comment: The paper was revised to have proper reference and content from reviewers.
+ Respond to this comment

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 1
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.