Preprint Review Version 2 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Culture Integration and Rural Tourism Development: A Scoping Literature Review

Version 1 : Received: 21 October 2022 / Approved: 26 October 2022 / Online: 26 October 2022 (09:21:11 CEST)
Version 2 : Received: 6 January 2023 / Approved: 6 January 2023 / Online: 6 January 2023 (10:06:05 CET)

How to cite: Tang, M.; Xu, H. Culture Integration and Rural Tourism Development: A Scoping Literature Review. Preprints 2022, 2022100406. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202210.0406.v2 Tang, M.; Xu, H. Culture Integration and Rural Tourism Development: A Scoping Literature Review. Preprints 2022, 2022100406. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202210.0406.v2

Abstract

Rural tourism plays an increasing role in maintaining sustainable rural development. In-11 tegrating culture into rural tourism is multifaceted. Local communities have often been regarded as 12 homogeneous, and different voices within them are selectively presented or re-interpreted by pow-13 ers. A better understanding of how and why cultures are integrated into rural tourism is urgently 14 needed. This paper aims to investigate (1) the aims and motives of tourism managers to integrate 15 cultural concepts into rural tourism; (2) who has participated in the cultural integration process; and 16 (3) how cultures have been integrated into rural tourism. Based on a scoping literature review, we 17 found that cultures could add more attractions, such as historical heritage, artwork, cultural land-18 scape, customs, food, and language, to the natural landscape and bring more tourists to rural areas. 19 However, integrating cultures into rural tourism is not always successful. Conflicts of interest 20 among different stakeholders are also often found. Some of the worst cases of cultural integration 21 have even destroyed the original natural landscape and local cultures. While cultural integration is 22 complicated, injustice and perverse effects do not have to be a consequence of integrating cultures 23 into rural tourism. Multi-way communication among tourism providers, managers, and consumers 24 can mitigate disruptive outcomes and unlock positive social outcomes.

Keywords

cultures; heritage; indigenous knowledge; local people; losers; management; rural stakeholders; tourism; winners

Subject

Social Sciences, Tourism, Leisure, Sport and Hospitality

Comments (1)

Comment 1
Received: 6 January 2023
Commenter: Hongzhang Xu
Commenter's Conflict of Interests: Author
Comment: The first version of the revision after addressing the editors' and reviewers' feedback 
+ Respond to this comment

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 1
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.