Preprint Article Version 3 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Neural Assemblies as Precursors for Brain Function

Version 1 : Received: 12 October 2022 / Approved: 13 October 2022 / Online: 13 October 2022 (05:50:35 CEST)
Version 2 : Received: 17 October 2022 / Approved: 18 October 2022 / Online: 18 October 2022 (02:37:36 CEST)
Version 3 : Received: 3 November 2022 / Approved: 4 November 2022 / Online: 4 November 2022 (09:43:59 CET)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Greer, K. Neural Assemblies as Precursors for Brain Function. NeuroSci 2022, 3, 645–655. https://doi.org/10.3390/neurosci3040046 Greer, K. Neural Assemblies as Precursors for Brain Function. NeuroSci 2022, 3, 645–655. https://doi.org/10.3390/neurosci3040046

Abstract

This concept paper gives a narrative about intelligence from insects to the human brain, showing where evolution may have been influenced by the structures in these simpler organisms. The ideas also come from the author's own cognitive model, where a number of algorithms have been developed over time and the precursor structures should be codable to some level. Through developing and trying to implement the design, ideas like separating the data from the function have become architecturally appropriate and there have been several opportunities to make the system more orthogonal. Similarly for the human brain, neural structures may work in-sync with the neural functions, or may be slightly separate from them. Each section discusses one of the neural assemblies with a potential functional result, that cover ideas such as timing or scheduling, structural intelligence and neural binding. Another aspect of self-representation or expression is interesting and may help the brain to realise higher-level functionality based on these lower-level processes.

Keywords

neural; brain; structural intelligence; cell expression; evolution

Subject

Biology and Life Sciences, Biophysics

Comments (1)

Comment 1
Received: 4 November 2022
Commenter: Kieran Greer
Commenter's Conflict of Interests: Author
Comment: Major revision of the paper.
+ Respond to this comment

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 1
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.