preprints.org > physical sciences > general & theoretical physics > doi: 10.20944/preprints202207.0399.v26

Preprint Article Version 26 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Version 1 : Received: 25 July 2022 / Approved: 26 July 2022 / Online: 26 July 2022 (09:39:10 CEST)
Version 2 : Received: 27 July 2022 / Approved: 28 July 2022 / Online: 28 July 2022 (03:47:22 CEST)
Version 3 : Received: 31 July 2022 / Approved: 1 August 2022 / Online: 1 August 2022 (09:01:17 CEST)
Version 4 : Received: 2 August 2022 / Approved: 3 August 2022 / Online: 3 August 2022 (04:04:29 CEST)
Version 5 : Received: 3 August 2022 / Approved: 4 August 2022 / Online: 4 August 2022 (04:51:16 CEST)
Version 6 : Received: 23 August 2022 / Approved: 24 August 2022 / Online: 24 August 2022 (05:01:17 CEST)
Version 7 : Received: 28 August 2022 / Approved: 29 August 2022 / Online: 29 August 2022 (05:34:28 CEST)
Version 8 : Received: 4 September 2022 / Approved: 5 September 2022 / Online: 5 September 2022 (05:24:55 CEST)
Version 9 : Received: 5 September 2022 / Approved: 6 September 2022 / Online: 6 September 2022 (03:44:41 CEST)
Version 10 : Received: 6 October 2022 / Approved: 7 October 2022 / Online: 7 October 2022 (08:29:57 CEST)
Version 11 : Received: 16 October 2022 / Approved: 17 October 2022 / Online: 17 October 2022 (04:12:56 CEST)
Version 12 : Received: 14 November 2022 / Approved: 15 November 2022 / Online: 15 November 2022 (02:52:14 CET)
Version 13 : Received: 21 December 2022 / Approved: 22 December 2022 / Online: 22 December 2022 (03:14:47 CET)
Version 14 : Received: 27 December 2022 / Approved: 27 December 2022 / Online: 27 December 2022 (02:08:51 CET)
Version 15 : Received: 28 December 2022 / Approved: 28 December 2022 / Online: 28 December 2022 (03:07:42 CET)
Version 16 : Received: 29 December 2022 / Approved: 29 December 2022 / Online: 29 December 2022 (02:41:35 CET)
Version 17 : Received: 30 December 2022 / Approved: 30 December 2022 / Online: 30 December 2022 (01:55:51 CET)
Version 18 : Received: 3 January 2023 / Approved: 3 January 2023 / Online: 3 January 2023 (06:44:05 CET)
Version 19 : Received: 26 January 2023 / Approved: 27 January 2023 / Online: 27 January 2023 (07:05:20 CET)
Version 20 : Received: 6 February 2023 / Approved: 7 February 2023 / Online: 7 February 2023 (02:29:22 CET)
Version 21 : Received: 14 February 2023 / Approved: 15 February 2023 / Online: 15 February 2023 (03:05:26 CET)
Version 22 : Received: 23 February 2023 / Approved: 24 February 2023 / Online: 24 February 2023 (03:41:34 CET)
Version 23 : Received: 26 February 2023 / Approved: 27 February 2023 / Online: 27 February 2023 (07:58:55 CET)
Version 24 : Received: 5 March 2023 / Approved: 6 March 2023 / Online: 6 March 2023 (06:25:09 CET)
Version 25 : Received: 13 March 2023 / Approved: 14 March 2023 / Online: 14 March 2023 (06:39:18 CET)
Version 26 : Received: 15 March 2023 / Approved: 16 March 2023 / Online: 16 March 2023 (01:55:51 CET)

Today’s concept of time is based on Einstein’s theories of special (SR) and general relativity (GR). Many physicists anticipate that GR has an issue since it is not compatible with quantum mechanics. Here we show: SR and GR work well for each observer describing his unique reality, but “Einstein time” (Einstein’s concept of time) has an issue. It arranges all events in the universe in a 1D line on my watch, yet neither cosmology nor quantum mechanics care about my watch. Einstein time hides the big picture! In Euclidean relativity (ER), we replace egocentric Einstein time (proper time of one observer) with universal Euclidean time (proper time of all objects/observers). It originates from an absolute point O (Big Bang). In Euclidean spacetime (ES), all energy is moving radially away from O at the speed c. For each object, time flows in a unique 4D direction related to its position. Unlike other ER models, we claim that an observer’s reality is only created by projecting ES orthogonally to his proper 3D space and to his proper flow of time. ER gives us the same Lorentz factor as in SR and the same gravitational time dilation as in GR, but now we learn that they stem from a projection. ER outperforms SR in explaining time’s arrow and mc². ER outperforms a GR-based cosmology in solving competing Hubble constants and declaring cosmic inflation, expansion of space, and dark energy redundant. Most important, ER is compatible with quantum mechanics: It solves the wave–particle duality and quantum entanglement while declaring non-locality redundant.

cosmology; Hubble constant; gravitation; wave–particle duality; entanglement

PHYSICAL SCIENCES, General & Theoretical Physics