Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

What Is “Really” Taught in Financial Literacy Curriculum?

Version 1 : Received: 19 July 2022 / Approved: 21 July 2022 / Online: 21 July 2022 (11:00:16 CEST)

How to cite: Bai, J. What Is “Really” Taught in Financial Literacy Curriculum?. Preprints 2022, 2022070328. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202207.0328.v1 Bai, J. What Is “Really” Taught in Financial Literacy Curriculum?. Preprints 2022, 2022070328. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202207.0328.v1

Abstract

This article mainly proposes the point of view that financial literacy curriculum aims to make kinds of people, to make people with financial creativity of resource integration thinking and continuous ‘to conscience’ of morality, which is cultivate a way of thinking that can maximize benefits through the use of resource integration and constantly ‘to conscience’ to achieve goals for participants in financial structures with balanced interests. In this sense, this article argues that financial literacy is to make kinds of people with a financial mindset and constantly strengthen ‘to conscience’ through uniting of knowledge and action to achieve human well-being and benign operation of society. In this sense, this article attempts to determine what is really taught in financial literacy education in terms of curriculum theory. That is to improve creativity by cultivating financial thinking with constant ‘to conscience’. The views of this paper provide a new way of thinking about financial literacy education assessment. This changes the evaluation criteria of financial literacy education from the result-oriented of wealth growth to the process-oriented of financial creativity growth, trying to move the criticism of financial literacy education curriculum and evaluation from controversy to unity.

Keywords

Financial literacy education; to conscience; curriculum; alchemy; making kinds of people

Subject

Social Sciences, Education

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.