Preprint Article Version 2 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

A Possible Explanation for the Twin Paradox and Action at a Distance—The Relative Independence of Space and the Absoluteness of Simultaneity

Version 1 : Received: 12 June 2022 / Approved: 13 June 2022 / Online: 13 June 2022 (10:02:12 CEST)
Version 2 : Received: 17 September 2022 / Approved: 19 September 2022 / Online: 19 September 2022 (10:30:00 CEST)

How to cite: Qin, S. A Possible Explanation for the Twin Paradox and Action at a Distance—The Relative Independence of Space and the Absoluteness of Simultaneity. Preprints 2022, 2022060181. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202206.0181.v2 Qin, S. A Possible Explanation for the Twin Paradox and Action at a Distance—The Relative Independence of Space and the Absoluteness of Simultaneity. Preprints 2022, 2022060181. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202206.0181.v2

Abstract

This paper is mainly based on a stricter premise of the twin paradox and the assumption of inertial frame, discusses the properties of time and space under the premise of complete symmetry, and draws an interesting conclusion: the simultaneity of different reference frames is possible realized, and the space is relatively independent. And based on this, the twin paradox, cosmic inflation, ultra-distance action of quantum entanglement, microscopic space motion of particles, measurement problems and other phenomena are tentatively explained from a new angle. This interpretation is exploratory and new. At the same time, the author also proposes an experimental way to test the relative independence of space.At the same time, this paper attempts to strictly prove that Einstein's definition of simultaneity and spatial absoluteness in special relativity may be problematic.

Keywords

the absoluteness of simultaneity; the relative independence of space; special relativity; the problem of measuring; the action at a distance; cosmic inflation

Subject

Physical Sciences, Theoretical Physics

Comments (1)

Comment 1
Received: 19 September 2022
Commenter: Sheng Qin
Commenter's Conflict of Interests: Author
Comment: Many thanks to the editors for their help and suggestions on the paper.
+ Respond to this comment

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 1
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.