Preprint Short Note Version 2 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Incompatibility of Published ac Magnetic Susceptibility of a Room Temperature Superconductor with Measured Raw Data

Version 1 : Received: 9 December 2021 / Approved: 10 December 2021 / Online: 10 December 2021 (14:08:48 CET)
Version 2 : Received: 19 December 2021 / Approved: 21 December 2021 / Online: 21 December 2021 (09:00:23 CET)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Hirsch, J.E.; van der Marel, D. Incompatibility of Published Ac Magnetic Susceptibility of a Room Temperature Superconductor with Measured Raw Data. Matter and Radiation at Extremes 2022, 7, doi:10.1063/5.0088429. Hirsch, J.E.; van der Marel, D. Incompatibility of Published Ac Magnetic Susceptibility of a Room Temperature Superconductor with Measured Raw Data. Matter and Radiation at Extremes 2022, 7, doi:10.1063/5.0088429.

Abstract

Room temperature superconductivity has recently been reported for a carbonaceous sulfur hydride (CSH) under high pressure by Snider et al [1]. The paper reports sharp drops in magnetic susceptibility as a function of temperature for five different pressures, that are interpreted as signaling a superconducting transition. Here I question the validity and faithfulness of the magnetic susceptibility data presented in the paper by comparison with the measured raw data reported by two of the authors of ref. [2]. This invalidates the assertion of the paper [1] that the susceptibility measurements support the case for superconductivity in this compound.

Keywords

hydride superconductor; room temperature superconductor; pressure; diamond anvil cell; ac magnetic susceptibility; raw data; background signal; random noise

Subject

Physical Sciences, Condensed Matter Physics

Comments (1)

Comment 1
Received: 21 December 2021
Commenter: Jorge Hirsch
Commenter's Conflict of Interests: Author
Comment: added Figs. 4, 5, 6 and associated discussion
+ Respond to this comment

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 1
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.