Preprint Data Descriptor Version 3 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Sustainable Building Plan-Design, Construction, Performance, and Renovation Criteria

Version 1 : Received: 11 August 2021 / Approved: 13 August 2021 / Online: 13 August 2021 (09:12:37 CEST)
Version 2 : Received: 14 August 2021 / Approved: 16 August 2021 / Online: 16 August 2021 (10:48:36 CEST)
Version 3 : Received: 27 December 2021 / Approved: 28 December 2021 / Online: 28 December 2021 (10:52:46 CET)

How to cite: Chan, P.; Khoeng, K.; Ung, H.K.; Tang, T.; Eung, K.; Uth, S.; Meng, S.; Sun, L.; Em, S.; Toum, H.; Phok, O.; Sry, R.; Mok, L.; Lo, R.; Vat, C.; Phay, S.; Hor, O.; Cheath, C.V.; Lim, M.; An, P.; Sareun, M.; Sot, S.; Va, S.; Chea, Y.; Piseth, M.R. Sustainable Building Plan-Design, Construction, Performance, and Renovation Criteria. Preprints 2021, 2021080295 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202108.0295.v3). Chan, P.; Khoeng, K.; Ung, H.K.; Tang, T.; Eung, K.; Uth, S.; Meng, S.; Sun, L.; Em, S.; Toum, H.; Phok, O.; Sry, R.; Mok, L.; Lo, R.; Vat, C.; Phay, S.; Hor, O.; Cheath, C.V.; Lim, M.; An, P.; Sareun, M.; Sot, S.; Va, S.; Chea, Y.; Piseth, M.R. Sustainable Building Plan-Design, Construction, Performance, and Renovation Criteria. Preprints 2021, 2021080295 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202108.0295.v3).

Abstract

Published data or available literature on sustainable building plan-design, construction, performance, and renovation criteria have covered some stages or some parts of each stage. These data usually have been published partially in many different papers―there have not been any papers that published these data together. Hence, this paper aims to collectively review these data and publish them together. The collection and review of these data were carried out by our twenty-five team members who specialized in sustainable urban, architectural, and civil engineering and construction management. The gathered and reviewed outputs were combined and validated based on a general group consensus. This consensus decision-making proceeded through two major group meetings with several follow-up meetings. The first major meeting was to combine and improve the gathered reviewed sustainable building criteria for Cambodia. The second major meeting was to validate the improved reviewed sustainable building criteria for Cambodia. The several follow-up meetings were to discuss the relevance and importance of the validated data “criteria and their classifications and descriptions” in all stages and more focused on their importance and applicability to Cambodia. The collective reviewed data in this paper would be useful to researchers in the fields. They could also be useful collective knowledge and information for policymakers from governmental agencies and development partners, particularly for sustainable building and construction companies.

Keywords

sustainability; sustainable building criteria; sustainable building planning and design; sustainable site selection; sustainable construction; performance and renovation criteria.

Subject

ENGINEERING, Other

Comments (1)

Comment 1
Received: 28 December 2021
Commenter: Puthearath Chan
Commenter's Conflict of Interests: Author
Comment: Details of changes are as follows:
- Proofreading and improving writing styles: whole texts, including the title.
- Improving the Introduction section: improving the state of the art and references to clearly address the research gap
+ Respond to this comment

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 1
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.