Preprint Data Descriptor Version 2 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Plan-Design, Construction, Performance, and Renovation Criteria for Sustainable Buildings: Data Review

Version 1 : Received: 11 August 2021 / Approved: 13 August 2021 / Online: 13 August 2021 (09:12:37 CEST)
Version 2 : Received: 14 August 2021 / Approved: 16 August 2021 / Online: 16 August 2021 (10:48:36 CEST)

How to cite: Chan, P.; Khoeng, K.; Ung, H.K.; Tang, T.; Eung, K.; Uth, S.; Meng, S.; Sun, L.; Em, S.; Toum, H.; Phok, O.; Sry, R.; Mok, L.; Lo, R.; Vat, C.; Phay, S.; Hor, O.; Cheath, C.V.; Lim, M.; An, P.; Sareun, M.; Sot, S.; Va, S.; Chea, Y.; Piseth, M.R. Plan-Design, Construction, Performance, and Renovation Criteria for Sustainable Buildings: Data Review. Preprints 2021, 2021080295 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202108.0295.v2). Chan, P.; Khoeng, K.; Ung, H.K.; Tang, T.; Eung, K.; Uth, S.; Meng, S.; Sun, L.; Em, S.; Toum, H.; Phok, O.; Sry, R.; Mok, L.; Lo, R.; Vat, C.; Phay, S.; Hor, O.; Cheath, C.V.; Lim, M.; An, P.; Sareun, M.; Sot, S.; Va, S.; Chea, Y.; Piseth, M.R. Plan-Design, Construction, Performance, and Renovation Criteria for Sustainable Buildings: Data Review. Preprints 2021, 2021080295 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202108.0295.v2).

Abstract

Published data or available literature on planning, design, construction, performance, and renovation criteria for sustainable buildings have been focused on some stages, such as design and construction stages, or some parts of each stage due to a limited number of collaborative scholars or the scope of their research. These data usually have been published scattered or partially presented in many different papers―there have not been any papers published these data, all-stage ‘plan-design, construction, performance, and renovation’ criteria, together. Hence, this paper aims to collect and review these data and publish them together. The data collection and review were conducted by our team, 25 members, who specialized in sustainable urban, architectural, and civil engineering and construction management. The review outputs were combined and then validated based on a group consensus. This consensus-based validation proceeded through several times of meetings. These meetings extensively discussed the relevance and importance of the validated data (main criteria and sub-criteria, including their descriptions, of sustainable building in all stages) and more focused on their importance and applicability to the Cambodian context. The collective and review data demonstrated in this paper would be useful to researchers in the fields. They could also be useful collective knowledge and information for policymakers from the governments and development partners, as well as for architecture and building construction companies.

Keywords

sustainability; sustainable building criteria; sustainable building planning and design; sustainable site selection; sustainable construction; performance and renovation criteria.

Comments (1)

Comment 1
Received: 16 August 2021
Commenter: Puthearath Chan
Commenter's Conflict of Interests: Author
Comment: We would like to update the Title and Abstract accordingly with the manuscript.
+ Respond to this comment

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 1
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.