Article
Version 1
Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed
Many-Electron QED with Redefined Vacuum Approach
Version 1
: Received: 11 May 2021 / Approved: 13 May 2021 / Online: 13 May 2021 (11:29:01 CEST)
A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.
Soguel, R.N.; Volotka, A.V.; Glazov, D.A.; Fritzsche, S. Many-Electron QED with Redefined Vacuum Approach. Symmetry 2021, 13, 1014. Soguel, R.N.; Volotka, A.V.; Glazov, D.A.; Fritzsche, S. Many-Electron QED with Redefined Vacuum Approach. Symmetry 2021, 13, 1014.
Abstract
The redefined vacuum approach, which is frequently employed in the many-body perturbation theory, proved to be a powerful tool for formula derivation. Here, we elaborate this approach within the bound-state QED perturbation theory. In addition to general formulation, we consider the particular example of a single particle (electron or vacancy) excitation with respect to the redefined vacuum. Starting with simple one-electron QED diagrams, we deduce first- and second-order many-electron contributions: screened self-energy, screened vacuum polarization, one-photon exchange, and two-photon exchange. The redefined vacuum approach provides a straightforward and streamlined derivation and facilitates its application to any electronic configuration. Moreover, based on the gauge invariance of the one-electron diagrams, we can identify various gauge-invariant subsets within derived many-electron QED contributions.
Keywords
Bound-state QED; Lamb shift; relativistic atomic theory; vacuum redefinition; ground state redefinition; gauge invariance
Subject
Physical Sciences, Acoustics
Copyright: This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Comments (0)
We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.
Leave a public commentSend a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
