Preprint Article Version 2 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

The INDIA Mutations and B.1.617 Variant: Is There a Global "Strategy" for Mutations and Evolution of Variants of The SARS-CoV2 Genome?

Version 1 : Received: 23 April 2021 / Approved: 26 April 2021 / Online: 26 April 2021 (20:14:21 CEST)
Version 2 : Received: 27 April 2021 / Approved: 28 April 2021 / Online: 28 April 2021 (17:18:50 CEST)
Version 3 : Received: 17 May 2021 / Approved: 18 May 2021 / Online: 18 May 2021 (14:05:33 CEST)

How to cite: Perez, J. The INDIA Mutations and B.1.617 Variant: Is There a Global "Strategy" for Mutations and Evolution of Variants of The SARS-CoV2 Genome?. Preprints 2021, 2021040689. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202104.0689.v2 Perez, J. The INDIA Mutations and B.1.617 Variant: Is There a Global "Strategy" for Mutations and Evolution of Variants of The SARS-CoV2 Genome?. Preprints 2021, 2021040689. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202104.0689.v2

Abstract

ABSTRACT. In this paper, we run for all INDIA mutations and variants a biomathematical numerical method for analysing mRNA nucleotides sequences based on UA/CG Fibonacci numbers proportions (Perez, 2021). In this study, we limit ourselves to the analysis of whole genomes, all coming from the mutations and variants of SARS-CoV2 sequenced in India in 2020 and 2021. We then demonstrate - both on actual genomes of patients and on variants combining the most frequent mutations to the SARS-CoV2 Wuhan genomes and then to the B.1.617 variant - that the numerical Fibonacci AU / CG metastructures increase considerably in all cases analyzed in ratios of up to 8 times. We can affirm that this property contributes to a greater stability and lifespan of messenger RNAs, therefore, possibly also to a greater INFECTUOSITY of these variant genomes. Out of a total of 108 genomes analyzed: - None ("NONE") of them contained a number of metastructures LOWER than those of the reference SARS-CoV2 Wuhan genome. - Eleven (11) among them contained the same number of metastructures as the reference genome. - 97 of them contained a GREATER number of metastructures than the reference genome, ie 89.81% of cases. The average increase in the number of metastructures for the 97 cases studied is 4.35 times the number of SARS-CoV2 UA/CG 17711 Fibonacci metastructures.

Keywords

SARS-CoV2; Biomathematics; vaccine; variants; mRNA; Fibonacci; Indian variants; B.1.617

Subject

Biology and Life Sciences, Virology

Comments (1)

Comment 1
Received: 28 April 2021
Commenter: Jean-claude Perez
Commenter's Conflict of Interests: Author
Comment: update abstract:
ABSTRACT.
In this paper, we run for all INDIA mutations and variants a biomathematical numerical method for analysing mRNA nucleotides sequences based on UA/CG Fibonacci numbers proportions (Perez, 2021). In this study, we limit ourselves to the analysis of whole genomes, all coming from the mutations and variants of SARS-CoV2 sequenced in India in 2020 and 2021. We then demonstrate - both on actual genomes of patients and on variants combining the most frequent mutations to the SARS-CoV2 Wuhan genomes and then to the B.1.617 variant - that the numerical Fibonacci AU / CG metastructures increase considerably in all cases analyzed in ratios of up to 8 times. We can affirm that this property contributes to a greater stability and lifespan of messenger RNAs, therefore, possibly also to a greater INFECTUOSITY of these variant genomes. Out of a total of 108 genomes analyzed: - None ("NONE") of them contained a number of metastructures LOWER than those of the reference SARS-CoV2 Wuhan genome. - Eleven (11) among them contained the same number of metastructures as the reference genome. - 97 of them contained a GREATER number of metastructures than the reference genome, ie 89.81% of cases. The average increase in the number of metastructures for the 97 cases studied is 4.35 times the number of SARS-CoV2 UA/CG 17711 Fibonacci metastructures.

and add anew chapter page 20.
+ Respond to this comment

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 1
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.