Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Oral Immunotherapy for Food-Allergic Children: A Pro-Con Debate

Version 1 : Received: 20 February 2021 / Approved: 22 February 2021 / Online: 22 February 2021 (12:20:56 CET)

How to cite: Mori, F.; Giovannini, M.; Barni, S.; Jiménez-Saiz, R.; Munblit, D.; Biagioni, B.; Liccioli, G.; Sarti, L.; Liotti, L.; Ricci, S.; Novembre, E.; Sahiner, U.; Baldo, E.; Caimmi, D. Oral Immunotherapy for Food-Allergic Children: A Pro-Con Debate. Preprints 2021, 2021020465 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202102.0465.v1). Mori, F.; Giovannini, M.; Barni, S.; Jiménez-Saiz, R.; Munblit, D.; Biagioni, B.; Liccioli, G.; Sarti, L.; Liotti, L.; Ricci, S.; Novembre, E.; Sahiner, U.; Baldo, E.; Caimmi, D. Oral Immunotherapy for Food-Allergic Children: A Pro-Con Debate. Preprints 2021, 2021020465 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202102.0465.v1).

Abstract

The prevalence of food allergy has increased in recent years, especially in children. Food allergen avoidance and symptomatic drugs in case of an allergic reaction remain the standard of care in food allergy. Nevertheless, increasing attention has been given to the possibility to treat food allergy, through immunotherapy, particularly oral immunotherapy (OIT). Several OIT protocols and clinical trials have been published. Most of them focus on children allergic to milk, egg, or peanuts, although recent studies developed protocols for other foods, such as wheat and different nuts. OIT efficacy in randomized controlled trials is usually evaluated as the possibility for patients to achieve desensitization, while the issue of a possible long-term sustained unresponsiveness has not been completely addressed. Here, we evaluated current OIT knowledge, focusing on the results of clinical trials and current guidelines. Specifically, we wanted to highlight what is known in terms of OIT efficacy and effectiveness, safety, and impact on quality of life. For each aspect, we reported the pros and the cons, inferable from published literature. In conclusion, even though many protocols, reviews and meta-analysis have been published on this topic, OIT remains a controversial therapy and no definitive generalized conclusion may be drawn so far. It should be an option provided by specialized teams, when both patients and their families are prone to adhere to the proposed protocol. Efficacy, long-term effectiveness, possible role of adjuvant therapies, risk of severe reactions including anaphylaxis or eosinophilic esophagitis, and impact on the quality of life of both children and caregivers are all aspects that should be discussed before starting OIT. Future studies are needed to provide firm clinical and scientific evidence, which should also consider patient reported outcomes.

Subject Areas

food allergy; oral immunotherapy; IgE, reaction; anaphylaxis; pediatrics

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.