Working Paper Article Version 2 This version is not peer-reviewed

The Origin of Phototrophy Reveals the Importance of Priority Effects for Evolutionary Innovation

Version 1 : Received: 25 November 2020 / Approved: 27 November 2020 / Online: 27 November 2020 (16:52:24 CET)
Version 2 : Received: 30 November 2020 / Approved: 1 December 2020 / Online: 1 December 2020 (09:44:13 CET)
Version 3 : Received: 18 December 2020 / Approved: 21 December 2020 / Online: 21 December 2020 (11:29:19 CET)
Version 4 : Received: 31 August 2022 / Approved: 31 August 2022 / Online: 31 August 2022 (14:37:11 CEST)

How to cite: Burnetti, A.; Ratcliff, W. The Origin of Phototrophy Reveals the Importance of Priority Effects for Evolutionary Innovation. Preprints 2020, 2020110700 Burnetti, A.; Ratcliff, W. The Origin of Phototrophy Reveals the Importance of Priority Effects for Evolutionary Innovation. Preprints 2020, 2020110700

Abstract

The history of life on Earth has been shaped by a series of major evolutionary innovations. While some of these innovations occur repeatedly (e.g., multicellularity), some of the most important evolutionary innovations (e.g., the origin of life itself, eukaryotes, or the genetic code) are evolutionary singularities, arising just once in the history of life. This historical fact has often been interpreted to mean that singularities are particularly difficult, low-probability evolutionary events, thus making the long-term course of life on Earth highly contingent on their chance appearances. Alternatively, singularities may arise from evolutionary priority effects, where first-movers suppress independent origins. In this paper, we disentangle these hypotheses by examining a distinctive innovation: phototrophy. The ability to use light to generate metabolic energy evolved twice, preserving information about the evolution of rare, transformative innovations that is lost in singularities. We show that the two forms of phototrophy occupy opposite ends of several key trade-offs: efficiency of light capture vs. return on investment in photosynthetic infrastructure, dependence on limiting nutrients vs. metabolic versatility, and complexity vs. simplicity. Our results suggest that phototrophy is a 'dual singularity' because phototrophic niche space is too large for the first mover to fully suppress future innovation, but not so large as to support many innovations. While often ignored over geological time scales, ecological interactions, in particular the potential for direct competition and priority effects, plays a fundamental role in the tempo and mode of major evolutionary innovations.

Keywords

photosynthesis; phototrophy; priority effects

Subject

Biology and Life Sciences, Anatomy and Physiology

Comments (1)

Comment 1
Received: 1 December 2020
Commenter: Anthony Burnetti
Commenter's Conflict of Interests: Author
Comment: Three important typos fixed (Type II / I reaction center, 'retinalophototrophy', and 'anammox'), and someformatting. 

Added a separate supplement file since the appended supplement to the PDF was not included.

It would be great if we could use the PDF submitted, but if not available then okay.
+ Respond to this comment

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 1
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.