Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Statistical Evaluation of the Level of Development of Circular Economy in European Union Member Countries

Version 1 : Received: 9 November 2020 / Approved: 12 November 2020 / Online: 12 November 2020 (18:10:48 CET)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Fura, B.; Stec, M.; Miś, T. Statistical Evaluation of the Level of Development of Circular Economy in European Union Member Countries. Energies 2020, 13, 6401. Fura, B.; Stec, M.; Miś, T. Statistical Evaluation of the Level of Development of Circular Economy in European Union Member Countries. Energies 2020, 13, 6401.

Abstract

In this paper, we have analysed the level of advancement in circular economy (CE) in the EU-28 countries. Firstly, we used a synthetic measure to examine CE advancement in EU countries in each of the Eurostat CE distinguished areas, i.e. production and consumption, waste management, secondary raw materials, and competitiveness and innovation. For the empirical analysis, we applied 17 Eurostat indicators to the CE areas. To find the synthetic measure in 2010, 2012, 2014, and 2016, we used multidimensional comparative analysis, i.e. a zero unitarisation method. Secondly, based on the synthetic measures of the CE areas, we created a general synthetic measure of the CE advancement of the EU-28 countries as well as the countries’ rankings. Thirdly, we classified the countries into groups according to their level of advancement in CE, i.e. high level, medium-high level, medium-low level, and low level groups. Finally, we applied a similarity measure to evaluate the correlation between obtained rankings in two most extreme moments in the period of analysis (2010, 2016). Our analysis covers all EU member states, as well as "old" and "new" EU countries separately. Our results confirm that highly developed Benelux countries, i.e. Luxembourg, the Netherlands, and Belgium, have the highest CE advancement level. Malta, Cyprus, Estonia, and Greece are the least advanced in CE practice. Apart from that, on average, there is some progress in CE implementation, significant disproportions between the EU countries were observed, especially among the "new" member states.

Keywords

Circular economy; Sustainable development; EU countries; Ranking; Classification

Subject

Business, Economics and Management, Accounting and Taxation

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.