Version 1
: Received: 3 November 2020 / Approved: 4 November 2020 / Online: 4 November 2020 (08:28:30 CET)
How to cite:
Peek, K. Inter-rater reliability of an exercise adherence measurement tool: Measurement Of adherence Via Exercise Demonstration (MOVED). Preprints2020, 2020110175. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202011.0175.v1
Peek, K. Inter-rater reliability of an exercise adherence measurement tool: Measurement Of adherence Via Exercise Demonstration (MOVED). Preprints 2020, 2020110175. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202011.0175.v1
Peek, K. Inter-rater reliability of an exercise adherence measurement tool: Measurement Of adherence Via Exercise Demonstration (MOVED). Preprints2020, 2020110175. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202011.0175.v1
APA Style
Peek, K. (2020). Inter-rater reliability of an exercise adherence measurement tool: Measurement Of adherence Via Exercise Demonstration (MOVED). Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202011.0175.v1
Chicago/Turabian Style
Peek, K. 2020 "Inter-rater reliability of an exercise adherence measurement tool: Measurement Of adherence Via Exercise Demonstration (MOVED)" Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202011.0175.v1
Abstract
Objective: To explore the inter-rater reliability of the Measurement Of adherence Via Exercise Demonstration (MOVED) adherence tool. Design: Reliability study of a patient adherence measurement tool.Setting: Simulated physiotherapist-patient consultations. Participants: Sixteen experienced physiotherapists rated patient adherence to exercise. Interventions: N/A Main Outcome Measure: Inter-rater reliability of MOVED.Methods: The MOVED tool consists of two parts. Part one asks patients to self-report their adherence to exercise dose (including number of completed sessions, sets and repetitions in the last seven days). Part two asks patients to demonstrate each exercise. Component scores are totalled to give an overall level of patient adherence to each exercise.Participants were provided with a copy of five physiotherapist-prescribed exercises. Participants were then shown five corresponding video vignettes of simulated physiotherapist-patient consultations where patients were asked to self-report exercise frequency, sets and repetitions and demonstrate each exercise within the context of a consultation. Participants were asked to rate the level of patient adherence to each of the five exercises using the MOVED tool. Inter-rater reliability of MOVED scores was assessed using Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and 95% Confidence Intervals. Results: The ICC of part one (self-report) was .90 (95%CI .74-.98), part two (demonstration) was .98 (95%CI .94-.99) and total score was .96 (95%CI .88-.99), demonstrating excellent inter-rater reliability. Conclusion: The MOVED tool, which can highlight whether patients are adhering to exercise technique as well as exercise dose, may provide clinicians and researchers with a more robust measure of exercise adherence when compared with other measures currently available.
Medicine and Pharmacology, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
Copyright:
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
