Version 1
: Received: 15 July 2020 / Approved: 20 July 2020 / Online: 20 July 2020 (08:05:06 CEST)
How to cite:
Blazquez-Hinarejos, M.; Saka-Herrán, C.; Diez-Alonso, V.; Lopez-Lopez, J.; Ayuso‐Montero, R.; Velasco-Ortega, E. Reliability and Validity of Three Instruments for Measuring Implant Stability Quotient. Preprints2020, 2020070457. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202007.0457.v1
Blazquez-Hinarejos, M.; Saka-Herrán, C.; Diez-Alonso, V.; Lopez-Lopez, J.; Ayuso‐Montero, R.; Velasco-Ortega, E. Reliability and Validity of Three Instruments for Measuring Implant Stability Quotient. Preprints 2020, 2020070457. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202007.0457.v1
Blazquez-Hinarejos, M.; Saka-Herrán, C.; Diez-Alonso, V.; Lopez-Lopez, J.; Ayuso‐Montero, R.; Velasco-Ortega, E. Reliability and Validity of Three Instruments for Measuring Implant Stability Quotient. Preprints2020, 2020070457. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202007.0457.v1
APA Style
Blazquez-Hinarejos, M., Saka-Herrán, C., Diez-Alonso, V., Lopez-Lopez, J., Ayuso‐Montero, R., & Velasco-Ortega, E. (2020). Reliability and Validity of Three Instruments for Measuring Implant Stability Quotient. Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202007.0457.v1
Chicago/Turabian Style
Blazquez-Hinarejos, M., Raúl Ayuso‐Montero and Eugenio Velasco-Ortega. 2020 "Reliability and Validity of Three Instruments for Measuring Implant Stability Quotient" Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202007.0457.v1
Abstract
Background: Actually, resonance frequency analysis (RFA) is the most extended method for measuring implant stability. The implant stability quotient (ISQ) is the measure obtained by the different RFA devices, however, inter- and intra- rater reliability and validity of some devices remains unknown. Methods: Thirty implants were placed in 3 different pig mandibles. ISQ was measured axial and parallel with Osstell® Beacon, Penguin® and MegaISQ® by 2 different operators and one operator performed a test-retest. Intraclass correlation coefficient was calculated to assess the intra- and inter-rater reliability. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to assess the validity. Results: The higher inter- and intra- rater reliability was obtained by Penguin® when measuring axial. The highest ISQ values were obtained using Penguin® in an axial measurement; the lowest, using the MegaISQ® in an axial measurement. The highest correlation values with the other devices were obtained by MegaISQ® measuring axially. Conclusion: Penguin® had a good reliability for measuring ISQ both inter- and intra- rater. Osstell® had good validity for measuring ISQ both axial and parallel and MegaISQ® had the best validity for measuring ISQ axial.
Keywords
resonance frequency analysis; implant stability quotient; reliability; validity
Subject
Chemistry and Materials Science, Biomaterials
Copyright:
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
,
*
