Article
Version 1
Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed
The Elementary Proof of the Riemann's Hypothesis
Version 1
: Received: 29 June 2020 / Approved: 30 June 2020 / Online: 30 June 2020 (10:30:45 CEST)
Version 2 : Received: 5 July 2021 / Approved: 6 July 2021 / Online: 6 July 2021 (11:32:03 CEST)
Version 2 : Received: 5 July 2021 / Approved: 6 July 2021 / Online: 6 July 2021 (11:32:03 CEST)
How to cite: Feliksiak, J. The Elementary Proof of the Riemann's Hypothesis. Preprints 2020, 2020060365. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202006.0365.v1 Feliksiak, J. The Elementary Proof of the Riemann's Hypothesis. Preprints 2020, 2020060365. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202006.0365.v1
Abstract
This research paper aims to explicate the complex issue of the Riemann's Hypothesis and ultimately presents its elementary proof. The method implements one of the binomial coefficients, to demonstrate the maximal prime gaps bound. Maximal prime gaps bound constitutes a comprehensive improvement over the Bertrand's result, and becomes one of the key elements of the theory. Subsequently, implementing the theory of the primorial function and its error bounds, an improved version of the Gauss' offset logarithmic integral is developed. This integral serves as a Supremum bound of the prime counting function Pi(n). Due to its very high precision, it permits to verify the relationship between the prime counting function Pi(n) and the offset logarithmic integral of Carl Gauss. The collective mathematical theory, via the Niels F. Helge von Koch equation, enables to prove the RIemann's Hypothesis conclusively.
Keywords
elementary proof of the Riemann's Hypothesis; prime gaps; Prim Number Theorem; Tailored logarithmic integral; Supremum of prime counting function
Subject
Computer Science and Mathematics, Algebra and Number Theory
Copyright: This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Comments (0)
We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.
Leave a public commentSend a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment