Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Cultivating Quality Awareness in Corona Times

Version 1 : Received: 19 June 2020 / Approved: 21 June 2020 / Online: 21 June 2020 (11:49:59 CEST)
Version 2 : Received: 22 January 2021 / Approved: 28 January 2021 / Online: 28 January 2021 (12:45:14 CET)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Timmerman, Guus, Andries Baart, and Jan den Bakker. "Cultivating Quality Awareness in Corona Times." Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy (Published online: 31 March 2021): 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-021-10010-x. Timmerman, Guus, Andries Baart, and Jan den Bakker. "Cultivating Quality Awareness in Corona Times." Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy (Published online: 31 March 2021): 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-021-10010-x.

Abstract

The Covid-19 pandemic is a tragedy for those who have been hard hit worldwide. At the same time, it is also a test of concepts and practices of what good care is and requires, and how quality of care can be accounted for. In this paper we put our Care-Ethical Model of Quality (CEMQ) to the test. Instead of thinking about care in healthcare and social welfare as a set of separate care acts, we think about care as a complex practice of relational caring, crossed by other practices. Instead of thinking about professional caregivers as functionaries obeying external rules, we think about them as practically wise professionals. Instead of thinking about developing external quality criteria and systems, we think about cultivating (self-)reflective quality awareness. Instead of abstracting from societal forces that make care possible but also limit it, we acknowledge them and find ways to deal with them. Based on these critical insights, the CEMQ model can be helpful to describe, interrogate, evaluate, and improve existing care practices. It has four entries: (i) the care receiver considered from their humanness, (ii) the caregiver considered from their solicitude, (iii) the care facility considered from its habitability and (iv) the societal, institutional and scholarly context considered from the perspective of the good life, justice and decency. The crux is enabling all these different entries with all their different aspects to be taken into account. In Corona times this turns out to be more crucial than ever.

Keywords

quality of care; Covid-19; relational caring; care ethics; practical wisdom; mismatch; humanness: solicitude: habitability

Subject

Arts and Humanities, Philosophy

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.