Preprint Review Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

120 Years of Untangling the Divaricate Habit: A Review

Version 1 : Received: 14 April 2020 / Approved: 15 April 2020 / Online: 15 April 2020 (10:31:08 CEST)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Maurin, K. J. L.; Lusk, C. H. 120 Years of Untangling the Divaricate Habit: A Review. New Zealand Natural Sciences, 2021. Maurin, K. J. L.; Lusk, C. H. 120 Years of Untangling the Divaricate Habit: A Review. New Zealand Natural Sciences, 2021.


The evolution of divaricate plants in New Zealand has been the subject of long-running debate among botanists and ecologists. Hypotheses about this remarkable case of convergent evolution have focused mainly on two different types of selective pressures: the Plio-Pleistocene advent of cool, dry climates, or browsing by now-extinct moa. Here, we review the scientific literature relating to the New Zealand divaricates, and present a list of 81 taxa whose architectures fall on the divaricate habit spectrum. We recommend a series of standardised terms to facilitate clear communication about these species. We identify potentially informative areas of research yet to be explored, such as the genetics underlying the establishment and control of this habit. We also review work about similar plants overseas, proposing a list of 47 such species as a first step towards more comprehensive inventories; these may motivate further studies of the ecology, morphology and evolutionary history of these overseas plants which could help shed light on the evolution of their New Zealand counterparts. Finally, we compile published divergence dates between divaricate species and their non-divaricate relatives, which suggest that the divaricate habit is fairly recent (< 10 My) in most cases.


convergent evolution; divaricating shrubs; heteroblasty; moa; New Zealand; structural plant defences


Biology and Life Sciences, Plant Sciences

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0

Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.