Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed
Open Questions for Harnessing Autophagy-Modulating Drugs in the SARS-CoV-2 War
: Received: 1 April 2020 / Approved: 3 April 2020 / Online: 3 April 2020 (03:57:49 CEST)
: Received: 21 May 2020 / Approved: 23 May 2020 / Online: 23 May 2020 (10:45:40 CEST)
A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.
Journal reference: Autophagy 2020
At a time when the world faces an emotional breakdown, crushing our dreams if not taking our lives, we realize that together we must fight the war against the COVID-19 outbreak even if almost the majority of the scientific community finds itself confined to home. Every day, like everyone else, we, scientists, listen to the latest news with its promises and announcements. Across the world, a surge of clinical trials trying to cure or slow down the coronavirus pandemic has been launched to bring hope instead of fear and despair. One of the most recent has drawn worldwide hype to the possible benefit of chloroquine (CQ), a well-known and broadly used anti-malarial drug, in the treatment of patients infected by the recently emerged deadly coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2). We should consider this information in the light of the long-standing anti-inflammatory and anti-viral properties of CQ-related drugs. Yet, none of these articles evoked a possible molecular or cellular mechanism of action that could account for any efficacy. Here, given the interaction of viruses with macroautophagy (hereafter referred to as autophagy), a CQ-sensitive anti-viral safeguard pathway, we would like to discuss some pros and cons concerning the current therapeutic options targeting this process.
anti-viral; COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2; autophagy; chloroquine; hydroxychloroquine; immunology; infection; inflammation; lysophagy; microbiology; Plaquenil; SARS; virophagy
LIFE SCIENCES, Virology
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our diversity statement.