Preprint Article Version 1 This version is not peer-reviewed

Benefits and Trade-offs of Dairy System Changes Aimed at Reducing Nitrate Leaching

Version 1 : Received: 13 November 2019 / Approved: 15 November 2019 / Online: 15 November 2019 (03:51:03 CET)

How to cite: Beukes, P.; Romera, A.; Hutchinson, K.; van der Weerden, T.; de Klein, C.; Dalley, D.; Chapman, D.; Glassey, C.; Dynes, R. Benefits and Trade-offs of Dairy System Changes Aimed at Reducing Nitrate Leaching. Preprints 2019, 2019110169 (doi: 10.20944/preprints201911.0169.v1). Beukes, P.; Romera, A.; Hutchinson, K.; van der Weerden, T.; de Klein, C.; Dalley, D.; Chapman, D.; Glassey, C.; Dynes, R. Benefits and Trade-offs of Dairy System Changes Aimed at Reducing Nitrate Leaching. Preprints 2019, 2019110169 (doi: 10.20944/preprints201911.0169.v1).

Abstract

Between 2011 and 2016 small-scale farm trials were run across three dairy regions of New Zealand (Waikato, Canterbury, Otago) to compare the performance of typical regional farm systems with farm systems implementing a combination of mitigation options most suitable to the region. The trials ran for at least three consecutive years with detailed recording of milk production and input costs. Nitrate leaching per hectare of the milking platform (where lactating cows are kept) was estimated using either measurements (suction cups), models, or soil mineral nitrogen measurements. Post-trial, detailed farm information was used in the New Zealand greenhouse gas inventory methodology to calculate the emissions from all sources; dairy platform, dairy support land used for wintering non-lactating cows (where applicable) and replacement stock, and imported supplements. Nitrate leaching was also estimated for the support land and growing of supplements imported from off-farm using the same methods as for the platform. Operating profit (NZ$/ha/year), nitrate leaching (kg N/ha/year), and greenhouse gas emissions (t CO2-e/ha/year) were all expressed per hectare of milking platform to enable comparisons across regions. Nitrate leaching mitigations adopted in lower-input (less imported feed and N fertiliser) farm systems reduced leaching by 22 to 30 percent, and greenhouse gas emissions by between nine and 24 percent. The exception was the wintering barn system in Otago where nitrate leaching was reduced by 45 percent but greenhouse gas emissions were unchanged due to greater manure storage and handling. Important drivers of a lower environmental footprint are reducing nitrogen fertiliser and imported feed. Their effect is to reduce nitrogen surplus and feed flow through the herd and drive down both greenhouse gas emissions and nitrate leaching. Emission reductions in the lower-input systems of Waikato and Canterbury came at an average loss of profit of approximately NZ$100/t CO2-e (three to five percent of industry average profit per hectare).

Subject Areas

greenhouse gases; operating profit; mitigations; carbon price; environmental footprint

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.