Preprint Concept Paper Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

An Ontological and Semantic Foundation for Safety and Security Science

Version 1 : Received: 30 October 2019 / Approved: 31 October 2019 / Online: 31 October 2019 (09:36:29 CET)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Blokland, P.; Reniers, G. An Ontological and Semantic Foundation for Safety and Security Science. Sustainability 2019, 11, 6024. Blokland, P.; Reniers, G. An Ontological and Semantic Foundation for Safety and Security Science. Sustainability 2019, 11, 6024.

Journal reference: Sustainability 2019, 11, 6024
DOI: 10.3390/su11216024

Abstract

When discussing the concepts of risk, safety, and security, people have an intuitive understanding of what these concepts mean, and, to a certain level, this understanding is universal. However, when delving into the real meaning of these concepts, one is likely to fall into semantic debates and ontological discussions. In industrial parks, it is important that (risk) managers from di erent companies, belonging to one and the same park, have the same understanding of the concepts of risk, safety, and security. It is even important that all companies in all industrial parks share a common understanding regarding these issues. As such, this paper explores the similarities and di erences behind the perceptions of these concepts, to come to a fundamental understanding of risk, safety, and security, proposing a semantic and ontological ground for safety and security science, based on an etymological and etiological study of the concepts of risk and safety. The foundation has been induced by the semantics used in the ISO 31000 risk management guidance standard. Hence, this article proposes a coherent, standardized set of concepts and definitions with a focus on the notion “objectives” that can be used as an ontological foundation for safety and security science, linking “objectives” with the concepts of safety, security, risk, performance and also failure and success, theoretically allowing for an increasingly more precise understanding and measurement of (un)safety across the whole range of individuals, sectors and organizations, or even society as a whole.

Subject Areas

ontology; semantics; safety; security; risk; performance; definitions; concepts; safety science; ISO 31000

Comments (1)

Comment 1
Received: 15 January 2020
Commenter: Peter Blokland
The commenter has declared there is no conflict of interests.
Comment: This article is the same as the published article, which has been extensively peer reviewed!
+ Respond to this comment

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 1
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.