Article
Version 1
Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed
Faunal Biodiversity Research in the Republic of Georgia: A Short Review of Trends, Gaps, and Needs in the Caucasus Biodiversity Hotspot
Version 1
: Received: 22 August 2019 / Approved: 23 August 2019 / Online: 23 August 2019 (11:59:00 CEST)
A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.
Abstract
We evaluated progress towards animal biodiversity research in Georgia, a key area in the Caucasus biodiversity hotspot. By reviewing recently (1990-2018) published articles in all areas of animal diversity research, we unmasked the trends in biodiversity inventory, ecological and biogeographical studies, and conservation issues in Georgia. We concluded that species inventory and biodiversity research in Georgia has significantly increased during the last ten years, however the rate and extent of investigation is far from satisfactory. Major gaps remain in all branches of animal diversity research in Georgia, and consequently existing knowledge is inadequate to address modern challenges related to species and ecosystem conservation. We urge local governmental authorities and international scientific societies to support development of stronger research facilities and cultivate interest in biodiversity inventory and research in Georgia as an important step towards maintaining globally important biodiversity in the Caucasus.
Keywords
Caucasus hot-spot; Georgia; animal biodiversity; bibliometry
Subject
Biology and Life Sciences, Cell and Developmental Biology
Copyright: This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Comments (3)
We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.
Leave a public commentSend a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Commenter:
The commenter has declared there is no conflict of interests.
Commenter: Levan Mumladze
The commenter has declared there is no conflict of interests.
Commenter: George Japoshvili
Commenter's Conflict of Interests: I am working in same region and have a considerable experience in the field.
As I know authors have changed some information for the final publication, therefore I suggest to change this version with the new one.