Article
Version 1
Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed
Four Pitfalls in Sleep and Memory Research and How to Avoid Them
Version 1
: Received: 19 August 2019 / Approved: 20 August 2019 / Online: 20 August 2019 (09:50:03 CEST)
Version 2 : Received: 13 December 2021 / Approved: 14 December 2021 / Online: 14 December 2021 (10:40:37 CET)
Version 2 : Received: 13 December 2021 / Approved: 14 December 2021 / Online: 14 December 2021 (10:40:37 CET)
How to cite: Nemeth, D.; Gerbier, E.; Janacsek, K. Four Pitfalls in Sleep and Memory Research and How to Avoid Them. Preprints 2019, 2019080208 (doi: 10.20944/preprints201908.0208.v1). Nemeth, D.; Gerbier, E.; Janacsek, K. Four Pitfalls in Sleep and Memory Research and How to Avoid Them. Preprints 2019, 2019080208 (doi: 10.20944/preprints201908.0208.v1).
Abstract
Understanding the complex relationship between sleep and memory is one of the biggest challenges in neuroscience. Thousands of studies on memory consolidation suggest that sleep triggers offline memory processes, resulting in less forgetting in declarative memory and performance improvement in non-declarative memory. However, an increasing number of contradictory findings reveal potential issues with how research is conducted in this field, that weaken the reliability of these results. Here we describe four methodological pitfalls with respect to experimental designs and statistical analyses that should be avoided in order to unveil the true effect of sleep on memory consolidation: non-optimal experimental designs, task complexity, fatigue effect in repetitive tasks, and data analysis and availability. We then offer solutions that can be used in future research of sleep-dependent consolidation and also more broadly in memory research.
Keywords
sleep; memory; consolidation; napping; fatigue
Subject
BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, Cognitive & Experimental Psychology
Copyright: This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Comments (0)
We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our diversity statement.
Leave a public commentSend a private comment to the author(s)

