Working Paper Article Version 1 This version is not peer-reviewed

Human Discovery and Settlement of the Remote Easter Island (SE Pacific)

Version 1 : Received: 19 March 2019 / Approved: 20 March 2019 / Online: 20 March 2019 (14:54:52 CET)
Version 2 : Received: 28 March 2019 / Approved: 28 March 2019 / Online: 28 March 2019 (11:22:33 CET)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Rull, V. Human Discovery and Settlement of the Remote Easter Island (SE Pacific). Quaternary 2019, 2, 15. Rull, V. Human Discovery and Settlement of the Remote Easter Island (SE Pacific). Quaternary 2019, 2, 15.

Journal reference: Quaternary 2019, 2, 0015
DOI: 10.3390/quat2020015

Abstract

The discovery and settlement of the tiny and remote Easter Island (Rapa Nui) has been a classical controversy for decades. Present-day aboriginal people and their culture are undoubtedly of Polynesian origin but it has been debated whether Amerindians discovered the island before the Polynesian settlement. Until recently, the paradigm was that Easter Island was discovered and settled just once by Polynesians in their millennial-scale eastward migration across the Pacific. However, the evidence for cultivation and consumption of an American plant, the sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas), on the island before the European contact (1722 CE), even prior to the Europe-America contact (1492 CE), revived the controversy. This paper reviews the classical archaeological, ethnological and paleoecological literature on the subject and summarizes the information into four main hypotheses to explain the sweet potato enigma: the long-distance-dispersal hypothesis, the back-and-forth hypothesis, the Heyerdahl hypothesis and the newcomer’s hypothesis. These hypotheses are evaluated in light of the more recent evidence (last decade), including molecular DNA phylogeny and phylogeography of humans and associated plants and animals, physical anthropology (craniometry, dietary analysis) and new paleoecological findings. It is concluded that, with the available evidence, none of the former hypotheses could be falsified and, therefore, all possibilities remain open. For future work, it is recommended to use the multiple-working-hypothesis framework and the strong inference method of hypothesis testing, rather than the ruling theory approach, very common in Easter Island’s research.

Subject Areas

islands, discovery, settlement, colonization, Easter Island, Rapa Nui, Pacific Ocean, Polynesians, Amerindians

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.