Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Charged Dark Matters, Missing Neutrinos, Cosmic Rays and Extended Standard Model

Version 1 : Received: 19 December 2018 / Approved: 20 December 2018 / Online: 20 December 2018 (12:54:24 CET)

How to cite: Hwang, J. Charged Dark Matters, Missing Neutrinos, Cosmic Rays and Extended Standard Model. Preprints 2018, 2018120251. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints201812.0251.v1 Hwang, J. Charged Dark Matters, Missing Neutrinos, Cosmic Rays and Extended Standard Model. Preprints 2018, 2018120251. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints201812.0251.v1

Abstract

In the present work, the charged B1, B2 and B3 bastons with the condition of k(mm) = k >> k(dd) > k(dm) = k(lq) = 0 are explained as the good candidates of the dark matters. The proposed rest mass (26.12 eV/c2) of the B1 dark matter is indirectly confirmed from the supernova 1987A data. The missing neutrinos are newly explained by using the dark matters and lepton charge force. The neutrino excess anomaly of the MinibooNE data is explained by the B1 dark matter scattering within the Cherenkov detectors. And the rest masses of 1.4 TeV/c2 and 42.7 GeV/c2 are assigned to the Le particle and the B2 dark matter, respectively, from the cosmic ray observations. In the present work, the Q1 baryon decays are used to explain the anti-Helium cosmic ray events. Because of the graviton evaporation and photon confinement, the very small Coulomb’s constant (k(dd)) of 10x-54k and gravitation constant (GN(dd)) of 10xGN for the charged dark matters at the present time are proposed. The x value can have the positive, zero or negative value around zero. Therefore, Fc(mm) > Fg(dd) (?) Fg(mm) > Fg(dm) > Fc(dd) > Fc(dm) = Fc(lq) = 0 for the proton-like particle.

Keywords

charged dark matters, missing neutrinos, cosmic rays, gravitation constant, Coulomb’s constant, extended standard model, anti-Helium cosmic ray

Subject

Physical Sciences, Particle and Field Physics

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.