Preprint Review Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Risk Factors for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in Population-Based Studies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Version 1 : Received: 26 October 2018 / Approved: 26 October 2018 / Online: 26 October 2018 (15:28:44 CEST)

How to cite: Altobelli, E.; Rapacchietta, L.; Profeta, V.F.; Fagnano, R. Risk Factors for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in Population-Based Studies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Preprints 2018, 2018100636. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints201810.0636.v1 Altobelli, E.; Rapacchietta, L.; Profeta, V.F.; Fagnano, R. Risk Factors for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in Population-Based Studies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Preprints 2018, 2018100636. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints201810.0636.v1

Abstract

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) represents an important public health problem with a prevalence between 1.3% and 12.5%. Several population-based randomized trials have evaluated ultrasound screening for AAA providing evidence of a reduction in aneurysm-related mortality in the screened population. The aim of our study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the risk factors for AAA. We conducted a systematic review of observational studies and we performed a meta-analysis that evaluated the following risk factors: gender, smoking habits, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, Coronary Artery Disease and family history of AAA. Abdominal aortic aneurysm prevalence is higher in smokers and in males. It is important to underline that all countries, where AAA screening was set up, had high income level and the majority belong to Western Europe (United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy, Poland, Spain and Belgium). Abdominal aortic aneurysm screening is fundamental for public health. It would avoid deaths, ruptures, and emergency surgical interventions if abdominal aortic aneurysm was diagnosed early in the population target for screening.

Keywords

abdominal aortic aneurysm, risk factors, observational studies, meta-analysis

Subject

Medicine and Pharmacology, Oncology and Oncogenics

Comments (0)

Comment 1
Received: 3 November 2018
Commenter: Arkadiusz Jawien
The commenter has declared there is no conflict of interests.
Comment: Dear Authors,
I want to congratulate you for the review article. I want to thank you for citing my papers, references 11and 36. Unfortunately, in the table 1. in position Poland the spelling of both our names are wrong. It should be Derezinski and below Jawien.

I would be more than happy if you could correct our names.
Once again congratulation for your interesting paper,

My best regards,

Arkadiusz Jawien
Prof. of Vascular Surgery
+ Respond to this comment

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.