Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Measurement Invariance of a Direct Behavior Rating Multi Item Scale across Occasions

Version 1 : Received: 16 October 2018 / Approved: 19 October 2018 / Online: 19 October 2018 (14:36:31 CEST)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Gebhardt, M.; DeVries, J.M.; Jungjohann, J.; Casale, G.; Gegenfurtner, A.; Kuhn, J.-T. Measurement Invariance of a Direct Behavior Rating Multi Item Scale across Occasions. Soc. Sci. 2019, 8, 46. Gebhardt, M.; DeVries, J.M.; Jungjohann, J.; Casale, G.; Gegenfurtner, A.; Kuhn, J.-T. Measurement Invariance of a Direct Behavior Rating Multi Item Scale across Occasions. Soc. Sci. 2019, 8, 46.

Abstract

Direct Behavior Rating (DBR) as a behavioral progress monitoring tool can be designed as longitudinal assessment with only short intervals between measurement points. The reliability of these instruments has been evaluated mostly in observational studies with small samples based on generalizability theory. However, for standardized use in the pedagogical field, a larger and broader sample is required in order to assess measurement invariance between different participant groups and over time. Therefore, we constructed a DBR with multiple items to measure the occurrence of specific externalizing and internalizing student classroom behaviors on a Likert scale (1 = never to 7 = always). In a pilot study, two trained raters observed 16 primary school students and rated the student behavior over all items with a satisfactory reliability. In the main study, 108 regular primary school students, 97 regular secondary school students and 14 students in a clinical setting were rated daily over one week (five measurement points). IRT analyses confirmed the instrument’s technical adequacy, and latent growth models demonstrated the instrument’s stability over time. Further development of the instrument and study designs to implement DBRs are discussed.

Keywords

Direct Behavior Rating 1; Test 2; Sensitivity over time 3; Rating 4; School 5; Classroom Behavior 6; Progress Monitoring 7

Subject

Social Sciences, Education

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.