Preprint Article Version 1 This version is not peer-reviewed

Structural Safety Analysis of the Aqueducts "Coll De Foix" and "Capdevila" of the Canal of Aragon and Catalonia

Version 1 : Received: 5 September 2018 / Approved: 6 September 2018 / Online: 6 September 2018 (00:30:57 CEST)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

de la Fuente, A.; Alegre, V.; Blanco, A.; Cavero, T.; Quintilla, R. Structural Safety Analysis of the Aqueducts “Coll De Foix” and “Capdevila” of the Canal of Aragon and Catalonia. Infrastructures 2018, 3, 48. de la Fuente, A.; Alegre, V.; Blanco, A.; Cavero, T.; Quintilla, R. Structural Safety Analysis of the Aqueducts “Coll De Foix” and “Capdevila” of the Canal of Aragon and Catalonia. Infrastructures 2018, 3, 48.

Journal reference: Infrastructures 2018, 3, 48
DOI: 10.3390/infrastructures3040048

Abstract

The Canal of Aragon and Catalonia (CAC) is 134 km long and irrigates 105,000 ha (131 irrigation user communities) and it is own by the River Ebro’s Water Agency. The aqueducts are located between km 67 and 71 of the canal and were designed by the Civil Engineer Félix de los Ríos Martín in 1907. The cross-section of both aqueducts, Coll de Foix and Capedevila, was extended within the framework of the project by Fernando Hué Herrero in 1962 in order to reach design flows of 26.1 m3/s and 25.7 m3/s, respectively. The structural performance of the aqueducts has been satisfactory, nevertheless the hydraulic capacity has reduced over the years. As a result, the irrigation user communities have expressed the need to extend the cross-section of the aqueducts to meet the irrigation demands. Given the age of the structure and the different design considerations at the time, it is paramount to verify the structural reliability of the aqueducts in the new load configuration. Therefore, the objective of the paper is to present the structural safety analysis conducted and describe the new extended cross-section for both aqueducts (maintaining the original structural typology).

Subject Areas

safety; maintenance; reinforced concrete; heritage

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.