Preprint Article Version 1 This version is not peer-reviewed

A Full-Scale Comparative Study of Conventional and Side-Stream Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal Processes

Version 1 : Received: 11 August 2018 / Approved: 14 August 2018 / Online: 14 August 2018 (06:24:23 CEST)

How to cite: Wang, D.; Tooker, N.B.; Srinivasan, V.; Li, G.; Schauer, P.; Menniti, A.; Maher, C.; Bott, C.B.; Dombrowski, P.; Barnard, J.L.; Onnis-Hayden, A.; Gu, A.Z. A Full-Scale Comparative Study of Conventional and Side-Stream Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal Processes. Preprints 2018, 2018080250 (doi: 10.20944/preprints201808.0250.v1). Wang, D.; Tooker, N.B.; Srinivasan, V.; Li, G.; Schauer, P.; Menniti, A.; Maher, C.; Bott, C.B.; Dombrowski, P.; Barnard, J.L.; Onnis-Hayden, A.; Gu, A.Z. A Full-Scale Comparative Study of Conventional and Side-Stream Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal Processes. Preprints 2018, 2018080250 (doi: 10.20944/preprints201808.0250.v1).

Abstract

In this study, a full-scale pilot testing was performed with side-by-side operation of a conventional enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) process and a side-stream EBPR (S2EBPR) process. A comparison of the performance, activities and population dynamics of key functionally relevant populations between the two configurations were carried out. The results demonstrated that, with the same influent wastewater characteristics, S2EBPR configuration showed more effective and stable orthophosphate (PO4-P) removal performance (up to 94% with average effluent concentration down to 0.1 mg P/L) than conventional EBPR, especially when the mixers in side-stream reactor were operated intermittently. Mass balance analysis illustrated that both denitrification and EBPR performance have been enhanced in S2EBPR configuration through diverting primary effluent to anoxic zone and producing additional carbon (~40%) via fermentation in side-stream reactor. Microbial characterization showed that there was no significant difference in the relative abundances of Ca. Accumulibacter (~5.9%) and Tetrasphaera (~16%) putative polyphosphate-accumulating organisms (PAOs) between the two configurations. However, lower relative abundance of known GAOs was observed in S2EBPR configuration (1.1%) than the conventional one (2.7%). A relatively higher PAO activity and increased degree of dependence on glycolysis pathway than TCA cycle was observed in S2EBPR configuration using P release and uptake batch test. Adequate anaerobic solid retention time (SRT) and conditions that generate continuous and slow feeding/production of volatile fatty acid (VFA) with higher composition percentage of propionate in the side-stream reactor of S2EBPR process likely provide a competitive advantage for PAOs over GAOs.

Subject Areas

EBPR; side-stream; performance comparison; microbial ecology; activity

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.