Article
Version 1
Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed
Failure assessment of steel/CFRP double strap joints
Version 1
: Received: 20 June 2017 / Approved: 21 June 2017 / Online: 21 June 2017 (03:26:57 CEST)
A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.
Majidi, H.R.; Razavi, S.M.J.; Berto, F. Failure Assessment of Steel/CFRP Double Strap Joints. Metals 2017, 7, 255. Majidi, H.R.; Razavi, S.M.J.; Berto, F. Failure Assessment of Steel/CFRP Double Strap Joints. Metals 2017, 7, 255.
Abstract
In the current study, the failure behavior of retrofitted steel structures was studied experimentally and theoretically with steel/CFRP double strap joints (DSJs) under quasi-static tensile loading. A series of DSJs with different bonding lengths are also considered and examined to experimentally assess the effective bond length. To predict the failure load values of the tested specimens, a new stress-based criterion, namely the point stress (PS) criterion is proposed. Although some theoretical predictive modelling for the strength between steel/CFRP joints under various loading conditions has been presented, in this work by using the new proposed approach, one can calculate rapidly and conveniently the failure loads of the steel/CFRP specimens. Furthermore, to assess the validity of the new proposed criterion, further experimental data on steel/CFRP DSJs available in the open literature are predicted using the PS criterion. Finally, it was found that a good agreement exists between the experimental results and the theoretical predictions based on the PS criterion.
Keywords
double strap joint; failure load prediction; finite element analysis; steel; stress-based failure criterion.
Subject
Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
Copyright: This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Comments (0)
We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.
Leave a public commentSend a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment