Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Editor Behavior through maybe Coercive Citations

Version 1 : Received: 2 May 2017 / Approved: 3 May 2017 / Online: 3 May 2017 (08:27:17 CEST)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Herteliu, C.; Ausloos, M.; Ileanu, B.V.; Rotundo, G.; Andrei, T. Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Editor Behavior through Potentially Coercive Citations. Publications 2017, 5, 15. Herteliu, C.; Ausloos, M.; Ileanu, B.V.; Rotundo, G.; Andrei, T. Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Editor Behavior through Potentially Coercive Citations. Publications 2017, 5, 15.

Abstract

How much is the h-index of an editor of a well ranked journal improved due to citations which occur after his/her appointment? Scientific recognition within academia is widely measured nowadays by the number of citations or h-index. Our dataset is based on a sample of four editors from a well ranked journal (impact factor – IF – greater than 2). The target group consists of two editors who seem to benefit by their position through an increased citation number (and subsequently h-index) within journal. The total amount of citations for the target group is bigger than 600. The control group is formed by another set of two editors from the same journal whose relations between their positions and their citation records remain neutral. The total amount of citations for the control group is more than 1200. The timespan for which citations’ pattern has been studied is 1975-2015. Previous coercive citations for a journal benefit (increase its IF) has been signaled. To the best of our knowledge, this is a pioneering work on coercive citations for personal (editors’) benefit. Editorial teams should be aware about this type of potentially unethical behavior and act accordingly.

Keywords

academic journal editor; citations; inappropriate tactics; coercive citations; citations overdose

Subject

Social Sciences, Library and Information Sciences

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.