ARTICLE | doi:10.20944/preprints202110.0065.v2
Subject: Computer Science And Mathematics, Information Systems Keywords: access to justice; cost of justice; judicial system; videoconferencing; judicial information system; litigants; internet technologies
Online: 11 April 2022 (10:10:21 CEST)
This venture targets giving a correspondence framework that can improve the legal framework execution and cooperation and furthermore make it simple to lead execution audits. This examination depicts restricted admittance to the right legitimate data just as admittance to courts and court administrations as the essential factors that limit admittance to equity. The basic target fundamental for accomplishing the point incorporates planning an online easy to understand data framework that would improve correspondence and association between legal professionals like legal advisors and disputants. The undertaking uses a subjective methodology that zeroed in on the substance investigation of essential information. Key members were court laborers like attorneys and agents, just as court clients like disputants. Pre-plan discoveries uncovered that current legitimate data frameworks – basically court sites – neglect to recognize their crowd by treating all court clients similarly comparative with the correspondence of lawful data. Likewise, the issue of admittance to equity includes the significant expense of equity also, restricted legal data that elevates admittance to equity. Post-plan discoveries from the online overview directed after the turn of events and execution of the IT curio uncovered a powerful and productive legitimate data framework. Exploration discoveries supported the advancement of an IT antiquity that records for huge shortcomings in current legal data frameworks, for example, their failure to pass on fitting legitimate data intelligently and productively. In outline, the investigation prescribes the reception of saw control to work fair and square of certainty of court clients and the differentiation between court clients to convey the right data to the right crowd.
ARTICLE | doi:10.20944/preprints201804.0263.v1
Subject: Arts And Humanities, Archaeology Keywords: antiquities trafficking; archaeometry; archaeological looting; expert evidence; judicial proceedings
Online: 20 April 2018 (11:17:32 CEST)
For most of its history, archaeology has taken an indulgent attitude toward looting and antiquities trafficking. The primary response to these dangers has been to publish the main findings made outside of academia. As a result of this approach and the prominent role played by police techniques in investigating such crimes, investigations are primarily based on documentary research. This approach makes it harder to determine such essential factors in this field as an object’s collecting history or discovery date. This paper offers an overview of the state of the research on the fight against antiquities trafficking. It then proposes new ways of studying collecting history, drawing on research projects on the use of archaeometry to shed light on cases of looting or trafficking involving police, court, or government intervention; hence, its qualification as “forensic.” Although the current state of knowledge does not enable the presentation of novel research, we believe that researchers and interested institutions should be made aware of the advisability of using archaeometry more directly in the fight against these scourges.