Hip fractures are the most frequently treated fractures in the world. Of these, intertrochanteric fractures (ITFs) account for almost 50%. After surgical fixation of ITFs, nonunion is rare. Nonunions are commonly produced from mal-reduction (in varus) and/or inadequate stability of the bone-implant construct and/or fatigue failure of the implants. Other causes of nonunion include posteromedial comminution and osteoporosis. The published incidence of ITF nonunion is 1%-2%. Mechanical complications of ITFs include cut-out, excessive shortening of the proximal femur, delayed union, nonunion, early implant fracture, nail toggle and cut through/medial migration. That is why a fundamental goal in the treatment of ITFs is to achieve stable fixation in osteoporotic bone, allowing early weight bearing. Intraoperative determination of fracture stability is essential. The American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS) clinical practice guidelines for the management of intertrochanteric fractures (ITF) in patients older than 55 years are the following: 1) In patients with stable ITF, the use of either a sliding hip screw (SHS) or a cephalomedullary nail (CMN) is advised (strong strength of evidence). 2) In patients with reverse obliquity fractures, a CMN is recommended (strong strength of evidence). 3) Patients with unstable ITF should be treated with a CMN (strong strength of evidence). 4) In patients with ITF, a short or long CMN may be considered (limited strength of evidence).

Background and objectives: The incidence of hip fractures in advanced age is increasing due to the aging society. In trochanteric region fractures of the femur, patient positioning can be performed various ways. The aim of this study is to clinically and radiologically compare the use of the supine hemilithotomy position, the lateral decubitus position, and the traction table when performing PFN surgery for femoral intertrochanteric fractures in the geriatric age group.Materials and Methods: A total of 170 older patients with femoral intertrochanteric fractures were included in this cross-sectional study. The patients were divided into three groups the supine hemilithotomy group, lateral decubitus group and fracture table. For the postoperative period, complications, length of stay in the intensive care unit, and length of stay in hospital were examined, while in postoperative radiographs, tip-apex distance (TAD), collodiaphyseal angle (CDA), and Cleveland-Bosworth quadrants were examined to evaluate the placement of the lag screw in the femoral head. Quality of fracture reduction was evaluated according to the modified Baumgaertner criteria.Results: The mean age of the patients was 77.77±8.8; 57.6% of patients were female. According to the modified Baumgaertner criteria, it was determined that patients with ‘poor’ reduction quality had an approximately ten times higher risk of cut-out than those with ‘good’ reduction quality. (OR = 10.111, p = 0.002, 95% confidence interval; 2.313-44.207). The duration of surgery of patient in the fracture table group was found to be higher than in the other groups, the CDA in the supine position group were found lower than in the other groups, and the TAD in the supine position group was found higher than in the other groups. Complications were mostly detected in patients who underwent surgery in the lateral decubitus position. (p<0,05) Conclusion: We believe that it is necessary to be familiar with all methods, since it is very difficult to choose the most appropriate method according to the surgeon’s experience, the hospital’s facilities and conditions, and the patient’s clinical status.