PitNETs, although typically benign, comprise a small percentage of therapy-resistant aggressive, occasionally metastatic tumors, underpinning a need to identify novel therapeutic targets. PitNETs carry few mutations but associate with conditions that promote alternative splicing as an oncogenic alternative and express the TrkA neurotrophin receptor, which exhibits oncogenic alternative TrkAIII splicing in other tumors. Alternative TrkAIII splicing was assessed by RT-PCR in 53 PitNETs and compared to HIF1a, HIF2a, SF3B1, SRSF2, U2AF1 and JCPyV large T antigen mRNA expression, unconventional Xbp1 splicing, SF3B1 mutation, and TrkA isoform(s) immunoreactivity by confocal immunofluorescence (IF). Alternative TrkAIII mRNA splicing was detected in all invasive PitNET phenotypes, was significantly elevated in invasive compared to non-invasive PIT1 PitNETs, relatively high in invasive and non-invasive SF1 and TPIT PitNETs, and was associated with IF consistent with intracellular TrkAIII activation but not with hotspot SF3B1 mutations, altered SF3B1, SRSF2 and U2AF1 splice factor mRNA expression, JCPyV large T antigen expression or unconventional Xbp1 splicing. A potential role for hypoxia in TrkAIII mRNA splicing was supported by significant elevation of HIF2a mRNA expression in invasive PIT1 PitNETs. These data demonstrate that alternative TrkAIII splicing, potentially promoted by hypoxia, occurs frequently in PitNETs and may associate with IF consistent with intracellular TrkAIII activation, supporting a potential role for TrkAIII in PitNET pathogenesis and progression, identifying TrkAIII as a novel potential target in refractory PitNETs.

Evidence regarding the role of oral antibiotics (oA) alone or combined with mechanical bowel preparation (MoABP) for elective colorectal surgery remains controversial. A prospective database of 8,359 colorectal resections gathered over a 32-month period in 78 Italian surgical units (the iCral 2 and 3 studies), reporting patient-, disease-, and procedure-related variables together with 60-day adverse events, was re-analyzed to identify a subgroup of 1,013 cases (12.1%) that received either oA or MoABP. This dataset was analyzed using a 1:1 propensity score-matching model including 20 covariates. Two well-balanced groups of 243 patients each were obtained: group A (oA), and group B (MoABP). The primary endpoints were anastomotic leakage (AL) and surgical site infections (SSIs) rates. Group A vs. group B showed a significantly higher AL risk [14 (5.8%) vs 6 (2.5%) events; OR 3.77; 95%CI 1.22-11.67; p = .021], while no significant difference was recorded between the two groups regarding SSIs. These results strongly support the use of MoABP for elective colorectal resections.