Background: Parkinsons’s disease is characterized by progressive worsening of gait, posture and balance with disability in daily life activities and to improvement in chronic musculoskeletal pain, often in neck pain associated with worsening of balance. The aim of the study is to investigate the correlation between scoliosis, balance and cervical pain in Parkinson’s disease. Methods: Cross-sectional, pilot study. A total of 16 Parkinson’s patients were enrolled in the study. The Pain Visual analogue scale and the short form McGill pain questionnaire measured neck cervical pain; static balance, Tinetti, Berg Balance and Short Physical Performance Battery scales(SPPB) were used to evaluate dynamic balance. Whole-spine standard X-ray assess spinal scoliosis with Cobb angles measurement .An observational statistical analysis was performed with the patients subdivided into a non-scoliosis (NS) group and a true scoliosis (TS) group based on whether they presented a Cobb’s angle below or ≥10°. Results: Frequency of neck pain in the NS group was 37% compared to 50% in the TS group. A non-statistically significant difference was found in terms of static, dynamic balance and cervical pain scores between NS and TS groups. Conclusions: Scoliosis, cervical pain and postural imbalance are significant yet often overlooked complaints in PD.

Limb-salvage surgery is the first choice for treatment of primary or metastatic bone tumors when possible to perform. Rehabilitation plays a major role after surgery, with the aim of improving function and maintaining the highest possible quality of life. Megaprostheses are currently the most frequent type of limb reconstruction used to treat the bone defect after tumor resection and The Modular Universal Tumor And Revision System (MUTARS®)is currently among the most used tumor and revision systems. Several studies have evaluated the causes and rate of failure of this system, but only few studies investigated the rehabilitative outcomes in terms of function and quality of daily life. The aim of this narrative review is to explore the correlations between functional outcomes and quality of life after implant of MUTARS® prostheses surgery in patients with bone tumor of the lower extremities. A comprehensive search was conducted on PubMed and Scopus using the following MESH terms: “MUTARS”, “Megaprosthesis”, “bone”, “tumors”, “metastasis”, “lower limb”, “rehabilitation”, “outcome”, “quality of life”, and 12 studies were included. The most frequent oncological pathology was found to be primitive bone tumors treated with modular prosthesis. Outcome measures used were Henderson et al classification, HHS, MSTS, VAS, ROM,LSR, KPS and quality of life questionnaire. Reconstruction of the lower limbs with the MUTARS® system seemed to be a valid treatment option after bone tumor resection. Rehabilitation after MUTARS® surgery is very relevant, but currently, functional and rehabilitative outcomes are inadequately represented in the literature. Therefore, further studies are needed to define best rehabilitation protocols in clinical practice after oncological orthopedic surgery.