Given the broad and intense use of plastic, society is being increasingly affected by its degradation and by-products, particularly by microplastics (MPs) -fragments smaller than 5 mm in size-, and nanoplastics (NPs) -with sizes less than 1 µm. MPs and NPs may enter the body primarily through inhalation, consumption, and skin contact. Once ingested, MPs can penetrate tissues, deviating to other parts of the body, and hence potentially affecting important cellular pathways such as nonconforming chemokine receptors that control the communication between the fetus and the mother. Consequently, the potential health harm induced by MP internalization is a major issue, evidenced by multiple studies demonstrating harmful consequences in diverse animal models and human cells. Here, an overview of the various modes of exposure to MPs and NPs is presented, including inhalation, placental transfer, ingestion, breastmilk consumption, and skin absorption, as well as placental and fetal toxicity due to plastic particles based on animal and in vitro studies. Though MPs in our environment are becoming more recognized, their developmental toxicity is still scarcely known. Besides negatively affecting pregnancy, MPs and NPs have been shown to potentially harm the developing fetus, given their ability to cross the placental barrier. Still, considerable gaps remain in our understanding of the dispersion and toxicity of these particles in the environment, as well as the precise types of NPs and MPs bearing the greatest dangers. As a result, we advocate for larger-scale epidemiological investigations, the development of novel approaches for measuring NP and MP exposures, and the necessity of understanding the toxicity of various kinds of NPs to guide future research efforts.

Enzyme immobilization is known to enhance polypeptide resistance towards environmental changes, particularly in terms of their stability. The Y509E mutant of β-xylosidase from Geobacil-lus stearothermophilus (XynB2Y509E) (which also bears xylanase activity) has been immobilized in chitosan spheres through either entrapment or covalent bond formation methods. In the immo-bilization by entrapment, besides observing a total loss of xylanase activity, it was found that chitosan concentration affects the process efficiency. Additionally, the maturation time of the spheres and the alkaline pH used to precipitate the spheres affect the β-xylosidase activity of the enzyme. In covalent bond immobilization, it was found that the pH during the modification with glutaraldehyde, as well as the subsequent protein binding, were key factors in preserving the dual enzymatic activity. The activity expressed after immobilization by covalent bonding was 23% higher compared to the activity expressed following entrapment immobilization, with values of 122.3 and 99.4 U. g-1, respectively. Both biocatalysts showed increased thermal and pH stability, along with an improved storage capacity, as they retained 40% and 88% of their activi-ty after being stored at 4 C for two months. Moreover, XynB2Y509E immobilized by covalent binding also exhibited outstanding reusability, retaining a 92% of activity after ten cycles of re-use.