Introduction: IFITM3, an innate immune protein linked to COVID-19 severity, has recently been identified as a novel γ-secretase modulator. Independent research has shown that IFITM3 may facilitate SARS-CoV-2 neurotropism in an ACE2-independent manner. In a previous study, we had detected perturbations in IFITM3 networks in both the CNS and peripheral immune cells donated by AD patients. The purpose of this study is to explore the transcriptomic evidence of the SARS-CoV-2 / IFITM3 / AD interplay, validating previous findings from our group. Methods: Exploratory analyses involved meta-analysis of bulk and single cell RNA data for IFITM3 and FYN differential expression. For confirmatory analyses, we performed gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) on an AD gene signature from AD Consensus transcriptomics; using the Enrichr platform, we scrutinized COVID-19 datasets for significant, overlapping enriched biological networks. Results: Bulk RNA data analysis revealed that IFITM3 and FYN were differentially expressed in two CNS regions in AD: the temporal cortex (AD vs. Controls, adj.p-value=1.3e^-6) and the parahippocampal cortex (AD vs. controls, adj.p-value=0.012). Correspondingly, single cell RNA analysis of IFITM3 and FYN revealed that it was differentially expressed in neuronal cells donated from AD patients (astrocytes, microglia and oligodendrocyte precursor cells), when compared to controls. Discussion: IFITM3 and by extent FYN were found as interactors within biological networks overlapping between AD and SARS-CoV-2 infection. SARS-CoV-2-mediated FYN/IFITM3 induction would mechanistically result in increased Tau fibrilization and Aβ oligomerization. FYN recruitment by viral processes results in abrogation of both fusion of IFITM3 vesicles with lysosomes; immunoevasion, by FYN-mediated impairment of autophagy would then serve to promote impaired detoxification from Aβ, while propagating Tau pathology in an IFITM3-independent manner.

Background: Critical states present scale-free dynamics, optimizing neuronal complexity. We explored electroencephalogram (EEG) criticality in amnesic Mild Cognitive Impairment (aMCI) patients with clinical improvement in working memory, verbal memory, verbal fluency and overall executive functions after the completion of a 6-month prospective memory training. (2) Methods: We compared “before” and “after” stationary resting-state EEG records of right-handed MCI patients (n = 17; 11 females), using the method of critical fluctuations and Haar wavelet analysis. (3) Results: Significant criticality enhancement was present in frontotemporal electrodes [mean dif: 0.10; Z = 7, p = .019] and isolated electrodes T6 [mean dif: 0.204; t (10) = - 2.3, p = .044] and F4 [mean dif: 0.0194; t (10) = - 2.82; p = .018]. (4) Conclusions: EEG criticality agreed with clinical improvement, consisting a possible monitoring biomarker in MCI and Alzheimer’s disease. Further evaluation is needed in patients under cognitive training or even drug-modifying therapies.